I must say I deplore the lazy (to put it kindly) way people assume that just because person A criticises person B for overreacting to a situation created by the generally-accepted-to-be-beyond-the-pale person C, that therefore person A is an apologist for person C.
It reduces any meaningful debate to a slanging match.
Donald Trump has a record of lying, distorting and giving what look suspiciously like knee jerk reactions to given problems, be it unemployment in the US, ISIS, the military record or the character of his co-Republicans.
Naturally he strikes a chord: it would be hard not for anyone with that large a hammer not to do so, but you simply can't do politics like that. Unless, as someone suggested, this all turns out to have been some sort of sick joke, and he will pull off his plastic mask, yelling "surprise!" just before the Republican convention, then I trust (and certainly hope) that this law of politics will do for him, if not at convention time then certainly at the Presidential election.