Donate SIGN UP

Are We Entering An Endless Cycle Of Irrelevant Stupidity?

Avatar Image
sp1814 | 20:47 Mon 15th Feb 2016 | News
130 Answers
The Internet is a great place for exchanging views, and challenging viewpoints...but have we entered a period where we now have two tribes - one waiting to be offended by something, and the other waiting for the first to be offended to condemn them for being offended?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/stephen-fry-condemns-twitter-as-stalking-ground-for-the-sanctimoniously-self-righteous-after-a6875506.html

Is this the future? Do we no longer really care about the issue, but are more interested in sharing how offended we are on the 'rainbow of outrage'?

What's your take on this?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 130rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
Please read this. Sums it up,rather well: http://viz.co.uk/calls-everyone-sacked/
22:04 Mon 15th Feb 2016
Mr Angry doesn't give a.............
Question Author
Jackdaw33

Okay - thanks for that, but rather than simply having a pop at me, why not share your thoughts?

When you write posts like that, it tempts the people you're referring to to attack you back - and that's not good is it fella?
/ getting on their high horse on behalf of someone who isn't even in the paddock!\

Double LOL. Where do you get these phrases from, sp?
> So these Twitterati are getting on their high horse on behalf of someone who isn't even in the paddock!

Yep, all is never quite what it seems...
Question Author
Jackdaw33

I think they're all metaphors.
Sp, you're question seems to describe Answerbank perfectly.
-- answer removed --
No black or white either. Argue that one;-)
if you disagree with someone you are being 'inflammatory'

if you make reference to a previous Tweet or post you are a 'stalker'

if you refuse to massage the ego's of the more popular contributors you are being intentionally abrasive

if you can't withstand the above then don't do Social Media ( including AB)
Question Author
divebuddy

I think literally no one is bothered by that. Especially seeing as what the colours of the rainbow now represent.
-- answer removed --
"My father always used to say, "Don't raise your voice. Improve your argument." Good sense does not always lie with the loudest shouters, nor can we say that a large, unruly crowd is always the best arbiter of what is right".

Desmond Tutu
I won't -I'll be tossing and turning all night wondering what the colours mean, its an outrage!
-- answer removed --
Just so I can follow this thread; is the 'irrelevant stupidity' the rainbow? And just who's being offended?
//Are We Entering An Endless Cycle Of Irrelevant Stupidity?//

I thought we did that years ago.
Oh dear oh dear oh dear. So the colours of the rainbow are for different Angels eh?
Question Author
agchristie

I met Desmond Tutu once at a church in Aldgate when I used to work up there. Lovely man.

And tiny.
but divebuddy -there is no 'pink' rainbow angel -the angel of empty closets
Question Author
Zacs-Master

No...the rainbow is a conversational detour.

It's my thing on AB.

21 to 40 of 130rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Are We Entering An Endless Cycle Of Irrelevant Stupidity?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.