ChatterBank1 min ago
Maybe Footballer Adam Johnson Won't Get Such A Harsh Jail Sentence After All?
180 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I cannot differentiate.
A footballer who has a sexual encounter with a girl he knows to be 15 years old, and a *** taxi driver who does the same. What is the difference. Both vile loathsome creatires who deaerve everything they get.
I just cannot understand why anyone is making limp excuses for Johnson.
A footballer who has a sexual encounter with a girl he knows to be 15 years old, and a *** taxi driver who does the same. What is the difference. Both vile loathsome creatires who deaerve everything they get.
I just cannot understand why anyone is making limp excuses for Johnson.
Jackdaw33,
The girls in the Rochdale case were not kidnapped. They were supposed to be in the care of the local childrens home but they absconded to be with their abusers. Exactly the same.
If your 15 year old daughter was sneaking off to be abused by a wealthy football star, are you really saying that you would be fine with that?
The girls in the Rochdale case were not kidnapped. They were supposed to be in the care of the local childrens home but they absconded to be with their abusers. Exactly the same.
If your 15 year old daughter was sneaking off to be abused by a wealthy football star, are you really saying that you would be fine with that?
Not kidnapped, not complicit, not thought worthy of support and protection? Dear oh dear.
We protect rapists in the interests of social cohesion do we?
Can't you recognise the difference between the offences? And the differences betweens the victims and perpetrators in both cases? And possible reasons for the imbalance?
At what point, if any, do you acknowledge that excusing rape on "preserving social cohesion" grounds become complicity in sexual crime?
Hope moderators don't interpret the post as hate crime. But, these days, who knows?
We protect rapists in the interests of social cohesion do we?
Can't you recognise the difference between the offences? And the differences betweens the victims and perpetrators in both cases? And possible reasons for the imbalance?
At what point, if any, do you acknowledge that excusing rape on "preserving social cohesion" grounds become complicity in sexual crime?
Hope moderators don't interpret the post as hate crime. But, these days, who knows?
VE,
I am not excusing the vile criminals in either crime. I am saying they are THE SAME. Johnson is guilty and likely to be sent down for 5+ years.
Why are you and your cronies not accepting his guilt and trying to make him into some kind of martyr. He isn't, he is just just a wealthy pervert who ought yo have known better.
I am not excusing the vile criminals in either crime. I am saying they are THE SAME. Johnson is guilty and likely to be sent down for 5+ years.
Why are you and your cronies not accepting his guilt and trying to make him into some kind of martyr. He isn't, he is just just a wealthy pervert who ought yo have known better.
Gromit
/// I cannot differentiate.
A footballer who has a sexual encounter with a girl he knows to be 15 years old, and a *** taxi driver who does the same. What is the difference. Both vile loathsome creatires who deaerve everything they get.
I just cannot understand why anyone is making limp excuses for Johnson. ///
Can't differentiate, Can't understand????
Yes you do seem to have trouble with both of these, but that is nothing I can do for you at this moment, perhaps you should seek help elsewhere?
But since you have come down vastly from nationwide Asian grooming gangs to mere single taxi drivers I will address the difference for you, in balance from the footballers case.
The women who innocently climb into a taxi and are later seriously sexually insulted, by the driver, is a vastly difference from an advanced teenager who purposely goes out of her way to strike up a relationship with an adult, even to climb into the back seat of the car with him, for a little consensual fiddling.
Stop digging Gromit.
/// I cannot differentiate.
A footballer who has a sexual encounter with a girl he knows to be 15 years old, and a *** taxi driver who does the same. What is the difference. Both vile loathsome creatires who deaerve everything they get.
I just cannot understand why anyone is making limp excuses for Johnson. ///
Can't differentiate, Can't understand????
Yes you do seem to have trouble with both of these, but that is nothing I can do for you at this moment, perhaps you should seek help elsewhere?
But since you have come down vastly from nationwide Asian grooming gangs to mere single taxi drivers I will address the difference for you, in balance from the footballers case.
The women who innocently climb into a taxi and are later seriously sexually insulted, by the driver, is a vastly difference from an advanced teenager who purposely goes out of her way to strike up a relationship with an adult, even to climb into the back seat of the car with him, for a little consensual fiddling.
Stop digging Gromit.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.