Katie Hopkins - Forthright As Ever...

[agchristie]

So, everyone who said 'let them in' is responsible for Brussels..

Is this a realistic assessment?

http://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/654627/Katie-Hopkins-Brussels-attacks-outrage-Twitter-blame-refugees-Angela-Merkel

[sp1814]

naomi24

Thank you!!!

The thing I admire about you (and I've said this elsewhere on AB) - no matter how heated the debate gets, you never get personal or resort to childish digs.

If I have (in the dozens of posts on this topic) have, I apologise.

You've made this truly enlightening and interesting!

[-Talbot-]

On this thread I posted
@ 22:18 Tue 22nd Mar 2016
and then
@17:40 Wed 23rd Mar 2016

And you come out with

sp1814
Hang on!

I've just realised something.

Is this the point where I can officially start whining that I'm being ganged up against?!!!

Oh I hope so...I've never had the opportunity before, and I've just clocked that it's three against one.




LOL LOL (as sqad would say)

[sp1814]

divebuddy

Not being funny - but when you write stuff like that (even if that is a reflection of what you feel), it kinda invites the person you're talking to, to respond in kind.

At that point, it turns into a giant slanging match - and that's what gets these interesting threads deleted.

So rather than taking aim at me, have a go at my position. Kill my argument dead. Show me where I'm wrong. That way, I can challenge you.

If you simply resort to personal digs, there's nothing much I can say.

Should we go on that way?

[sp1814]

-Talbot-

Sorry - still a bit lost...will search back through the thread...

[sp1814]

-Talbot-

To your post at 22:18...no. That's not what I mean.

Searching for the other now.

[sp1814]

-Talbot-

At 17:40 today, you wrote:

sp1814 re your earlier rude post to me ... what the hell are you babbling on about?

Can I have it again in English?

What is it you didn't understand.

Am happy to clarify.

[agchristie]

Rowlocks! I've lost all my oars to keep this thread from running off course!

I didn't expect a protracted discourse as to the argument of whether the bombers were Belgian nationals and not refugees! ;)

[sp1814]

agchristie

Just wait until I start talking about Belgian chocolates (spoiler - they're mostly rubbish).

[-Talbot-]

sp .. you posted

My actual position is that Europe cannot accommodate the influx of migrants, and that it's the responsibility of Middle Eastern countries to step up and take in the migrants. Aid (if required) should be assigned to these countries on a humanitarian basis.

That's my position.




sp, I have posted similar to that on AB and made my position clear, so I agree 100% and further to that I think and have stated the we in Europe should contribute to the economics of looking after the genuine refugees.

What is happening now is giving both economic migrants and terrorist opportunity to abuse the situation.

[agchristie]

Sp > Just wait until I start talking about Belgian chocolates.

Oh! not Belgian waffles then? ;)

[retrocop]

db
C/Sgt Borne to Lt Stroud R.E.
"Yes sir. I think the Gentleman has a bottle"!
Zulu.

[Samuraisan]

Ah the old "nature versus nuture " a bit of both I suppose, us parents instill our valies and morals into our children, but then it's up to them and, unfortunately the friends they make. If they get involved with a bad crowd, it is difficult and can be heartbreaking.

[Samuraisan]

Oops sorry, wrong thread.

[retrocop]

DB
Typo Lt Chard R.E. VC :-)

[naomi24]

SP. thank you. And I'm the one who has posts removed for simply laughing at other people's jokes. No accounting.....and all that. ;o)