Very sensible. Brexit seriously threatens the existence of the U.K. and threatens to destabilise Ireland. She has no choice. The votes in Scotland and NI cannot be ignored. What exactly one does, I don't know, but I don't think anyone else does yet either
Ridiculous. Considering views is fine but there should be no opportunity to delay without end by not agreeing unless you get everything you want, and perhaps not even then. I have to think that this must be being misreported as even a remainer PM wouldn't try that one.
We need the clarifications. A UK approach is fine, speaking to interested parties is fine, letting representatives of smaller groups dictate whether a UK government can proceed is totally unacceptable. It would destroy the Tory vote at the next election and make UKIP a major voice in government.
Mrs M has a problem here. If Scotland doesn't want to leave the EU
( and NI ) then what alternative is there to offering the Scots another chance of a Referendum ?
I will make it clear that I don't think Scotland could exist outside of the UK, but we are still left with the problem of how to address all those disaffected Scots.
Add to that, all those Scottish Tory votes that are not going to materialise and Mrs M definitely has a problem.
//what alternative is there to offering the Scots another chance of a Referendum ? //
That's exactly what should happen. If the Scots vote 'Leave', so be it. If they don't, then hopefully Sturgeon will shut up and allow democracy to take its course.
Difficult to remain credible on a U turn to such a blatant promise. Difficult to trust on anything ever again. Which is why clarification is needed now. What forces continuation after a deadlock.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.