Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Alexander Blackman Refused Bail.
For what reason would they refuse him bail, he not a risk to the general public.
Another case of out of touch judges.
Sgt Alexander Blackman refused bail pending new appeal
http://
Dave.
Another case of out of touch judges.
Sgt Alexander Blackman refused bail pending new appeal
http://
Dave.
Answers
//Not sure there is anything progressive about letting a convicted murder out on our streets// Gromit would never ever support such a Liberal action....in any circumstance
20:27 Wed 21st Dec 2016
divebuddy
Putting a bullet into a dead man would not be breaking the Geneva Convention.
He admitted at the time that he believed the man to be alive by saying he had just broken the convention. Likewise his comment to Soldiers A and B, that this (the shooting) doesn't go anywhere fallas.
Graphic content and swearing on the YouTube link.
Putting a bullet into a dead man would not be breaking the Geneva Convention.
He admitted at the time that he believed the man to be alive by saying he had just broken the convention. Likewise his comment to Soldiers A and B, that this (the shooting) doesn't go anywhere fallas.
Graphic content and swearing on the YouTube link.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
//I just wonder if the opinion of some on AB would be the same if the situation was IDENTICAL but it was an Afghan soldier who had executed a wounded British soldier! //
Guess what, we expect it, the soldiers expect it (and worse). If they can mow down their own kids with suicide vests, nothing except their own demise will halt their murderous intent.
Guess what, we expect it, the soldiers expect it (and worse). If they can mow down their own kids with suicide vests, nothing except their own demise will halt their murderous intent.
-- answer removed --
i think its tricky. No matter what your views on what happened, he has in fact been convicted of murder. We can't pick and choose what murders are "ok" and which are not can we? if we did, we would all have our personal views on which were ok, and which were not. If someone is convicted of murder, you would expect them to complete their sentence, or carry on serving their sentence while they appealed, and i would expect the same to happen here
Interesting debate. Strikes me Gromit is arguing from an objective view on the facts known to date, which is fair enough. Whereas Islay isn't and should be thoroughly ashamed of him or herself.
Islay is the worst sort of person to have any opinion on this matter.
On the strength of the current judgement he is a murderer, and as much as I disagree with it, them's the facts. Although as somebody has already pointed out, Chad Evans was a rapist , and many people on this site took great delight in that - although those same people were remarkably silent when he was exonerated, so I sincerely hope an exoneration will be forthcoming on this issue.
You cannot compare a murder in a British street to what (appears to me at least) something that happens on a battlefield. I have seen the video.
Islay is the worst sort of person to have any opinion on this matter.
On the strength of the current judgement he is a murderer, and as much as I disagree with it, them's the facts. Although as somebody has already pointed out, Chad Evans was a rapist , and many people on this site took great delight in that - although those same people were remarkably silent when he was exonerated, so I sincerely hope an exoneration will be forthcoming on this issue.
You cannot compare a murder in a British street to what (appears to me at least) something that happens on a battlefield. I have seen the video.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.