Has Anyone Got Any Pictures Of Daisy Lowe In A Bikini?

[andy-hughes]

There aren't anything like enough here ... Media URL: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4082546/Daisy-Lowe-looks-scorching-pale-pink-cutaway-bikini-flaunts-Strictly-weight-loss-Miami-beach.html
Description:

[Quizproquo]

AOG what a ridiculous comparison.
This was nothing but a bit of light hearted humour.
I think some of you either need to get out more or lose 20 years of age somewhere

[-Talbot-]

It means a written response on the thread in question, nothing more 'threatening' than that.



There you go all cleared up, wasn't too difficult was it.

[Quizproquo]

AOG what a ridiculous comparison.
This was nothing but a light hearted thread. I think some of you need to get out more or lose 20 years of age somewhere

[-Talbot-]

I think some of you either need to get out more or lose 20 years of age somewhere


My wife would disagree with the first bit but she probably would be pleased if I lost 20 years of age somewhere.


How do I go about doing that?

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // andy-hughes

I am often criticised for my choice of headline, and since yours stated this:

/// Has Anyone Got Any Pictures Of Daisy Lowe In A Bikini? ///

Is it any wonder you took so much flack?

Why can't you be noble enough to admit you chose the wrong headline instead of coming up with such feeble excuses as "The question was ironic", "A little light humour on the first day back at work" and "I know that irony is difficult to convey in print" etc? //

Two reasons - one, 'nobility' does not come into it, I have never shied away from admitting if I am wrong, and two, I thought that my OP was cleare enough as an ironic dig at the prurient Mail - once again.

I have a computer, and by virtue of the fact that I have found my way here, it is obvious that I know how to use the Internet, - if I actually wanted any pictures of anyone, I can find them myself, so why would I seriously ask that question on here?

// I wonder what kind of response I would received if I posted the headline :

"Has Anyone Got Any Pictures Of Adolph Hitler in uniform"? //

Since irony and humour are not your strongest points, and you have a history of war-related posts, I imagine you would receive a considerable amount of hostility!

But since you would be asking for pictures of a mass murderer, and I am ironically asking for pictures of a model, I would suggest one of us would be entirely deserving of a dose of approbation - wouldn't you?

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// it is supposed to be a newspaper, so comments on it's content are pertinent to a News section. ///

Not everything that is in a newspaper is pertinent to the News section.

For example, 'news' is but not crosswords, fashiion etc.

[andy-hughes]

Islay - //1/ Anyone who has poste here for any length of time would know that AH was being sarcastic and possibly ironic with posting this headline. //

Thank you - I was beginning to wonder if it was just me!!

[gness]

I'm just waiting for Daisynonna to see latest posts and panic.....☺

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //andy-hughes

/// it is supposed to be a newspaper, so comments on it's content are pertinent to a News section. ///

Not everything that is in a newspaper is pertinent to the News section.

For example, 'news' is but not crosswords, fashiion etc. //

When you get your own site, you can make your own rules about what is 'pertinent' to any one section.

Until then, it's in the hands of everyone on here - me included.

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - //It means a written response on the thread in question, nothing more 'threatening' than that.



There you go all cleared up, wasn't too difficult was it. //

Not difficult at all - shame you couldn't figure it out for yourself, but if you need help, I don't mind giving it.

[-Talbot-]

So are you telling me that there was only one possible interpretation for

''then they get what's coming. ''


?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - no I am not 'telling you' anything - except that your persistent attempts to derail this thread and draw me into a pointless argument with you are going to be ignored.

[-Talbot-]

My ... persistent attempts to derail this thread?

Are you being ironic again?

[andy-hughes]

Talbot - My post at 16:01 - //Talbot - // How could you possibly know whether a poster is deliberately missing the point? //

Easy - they post confirmation immediately, often, but not always, prefacing their misunderstanding with the preface "So ..." //

Your post at 16:43 - //So are you telling me that there was only one possible interpretation for

''then they get what's coming. ''


? //

That's why this is not going any further.

[anotheoldgit]

andy-hughes

/// Since irony and humour are not your strongest points, ///

Oh so the self praising AH can consider himself ironic and humorous, anyone who challenges him is deemed to have non of these qualities.

And just as a foot note just because a member of your fan club agrees with you doesn't necessarily make you right, especially if that member happens to have the track record that she has.

[-Talbot-]

This thread didn't even leave the platform never mind get derailed

[andy-hughes]

AOG - I'm not getting drawn into a pointless fight with you either - and if you want to spar with me, feel free, but leave your snide observations about Islay out of it - she is not involved.

[Islay]

//And just as a foot note just because a member of your fan club agrees with you doesn't necessarily make you right, especially if that member happens to have the track record that she has//

Catty AOG even for you - if you look back at posts you will see that AH and I don't agree on everything and I am not a member of anyones fan club!

Oh and 'she' has a name!!

[Garaman]

I fail to see how anyone can read the opening post as anything other than sarcasm.

[hereIam]

Love your post at 16:47 aog ....