ChatterBank5 mins ago
High Court Ruling.?
85 Answers
8-3 against TM. Fair ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anneasquith. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.What beats me is why the PM decided to appeal anyway, it was always a certainty what the result would be.
As the BBC has just pointed out all this has done is waste 82 days
( and £100,000's ) that could have been used for the parliamentary debate. This could all be over now and A50 triggered, if May had just done what the original court ruling told her!
This further reinforces my contention that our PM is either incompetent or has been intentionally 'set up to fail' at getting A50 through parliment.
As the BBC has just pointed out all this has done is waste 82 days
( and £100,000's ) that could have been used for the parliamentary debate. This could all be over now and A50 triggered, if May had just done what the original court ruling told her!
This further reinforces my contention that our PM is either incompetent or has been intentionally 'set up to fail' at getting A50 through parliment.
Fair? no idea without reading it. should be posted here later
https:/ /www.ju diciary .gov.uk /judgme nts/
the enabling bill likely to start life as a one-liner, however all the opposition parties are lining up with their blizzard of amendments, that will probably keep parliament busy for the next few years.
https:/
the enabling bill likely to start life as a one-liner, however all the opposition parties are lining up with their blizzard of amendments, that will probably keep parliament busy for the next few years.
It amused me to hear Paul Nuttall complain about the "farce" of a legal proceeding. I shudder to think what sort of country (aside from one without an NHS) UKIP would ever preside over.
As the government spokesman said in accepting this decision, we are fortunate to live in a country where even the government is subject to the law.. We should not take that for granted.
As the government spokesman said in accepting this decision, we are fortunate to live in a country where even the government is subject to the law.. We should not take that for granted.
The real problme will be not the law but how Parliament goes.
If parliament votes against the will of the people it is against democracy. i think that will be a bad thing and indeed could even wipe labour out and may even clobber the Tories.
TM needs to put it to a vote ASAP. If the vote fails or is bogged down with labour and pro-EU 'riders' then name those refusing to vote for the will of the majority and hold an election. Let them explain at the doorstep of their constituencies why they voted the way they did.
If parliament votes against the will of the people it is against democracy. i think that will be a bad thing and indeed could even wipe labour out and may even clobber the Tories.
TM needs to put it to a vote ASAP. If the vote fails or is bogged down with labour and pro-EU 'riders' then name those refusing to vote for the will of the majority and hold an election. Let them explain at the doorstep of their constituencies why they voted the way they did.
TTT 'A 50 will be triggered by the end of March as the Prime Minister said'
The reports all say things like ' should' or 'could' still be triggered by the end of March those small extra words have a huge significance!
I can't see this getting past parliment without at least 6 months to a year of debate and amendment!
The reports all say things like ' should' or 'could' still be triggered by the end of March those small extra words have a huge significance!
I can't see this getting past parliment without at least 6 months to a year of debate and amendment!