ChatterBank0 min ago
Isle Of Wight Mp Steps Down After 'gay Danger Remark'
http://
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
An old dinosaur that should have stepped down years ago, IMHO.
Good riddance !
Answers
Sqad But the procreation argument doesn't make sense, unless gay people are biologically incapable of producing children. And let's face facts - closeted gay people have been producing kids for millennia. So - homosexualit
13:46 Sat 29th Apr 2017
-- answer removed --
Togo
But in answer to your previous question (How come they get so much "air play" then I wonder) - it's because gay rights is still very much a hot button topic.
The Civil Partnership act was hotly debated, so was the Equality Bill and then so was the Marriage Equality Bill.
Aside from this, the subject of same sex adoption will (and has) generate a huge amount of debate.
This is the reason why gay people get 'so much air time'. It's because there are issues surrounding equal treatment which many people (including gay people) will have a view on.
The same no doubt happened during the 60s in America due to civil rights (why do the blacks get so much air time?) and in the 10s in Britain due to universal emancipation (why do the women get so much radio time?)
But in answer to your previous question (How come they get so much "air play" then I wonder) - it's because gay rights is still very much a hot button topic.
The Civil Partnership act was hotly debated, so was the Equality Bill and then so was the Marriage Equality Bill.
Aside from this, the subject of same sex adoption will (and has) generate a huge amount of debate.
This is the reason why gay people get 'so much air time'. It's because there are issues surrounding equal treatment which many people (including gay people) will have a view on.
The same no doubt happened during the 60s in America due to civil rights (why do the blacks get so much air time?) and in the 10s in Britain due to universal emancipation (why do the women get so much radio time?)
Sqad
But the procreation argument doesn't make sense, unless gay people are biologically incapable of producing children.
And let's face facts - closeted gay people have been producing kids for millennia.
So - homosexuality in itself cannot possibly be dangerous to society.
What would be accurate is this:
"Homosexuality is dangerous to society, when everyone becomes gay and penises and vaginas cease to function properly".
In that hypothetical situation, there is a danger to society. However, as homosexuality is not common enough to pose any threat to human existence, I think that it's safe to say that it's not a danger.
Think of it this way - a teaspoon of Ribena dropped into the River Avon is not going to make everything taste of blackcurrant, right?
Therefore it's not accurate to say that Ribena is a danger to the taste of water in the Somerset region.
But the procreation argument doesn't make sense, unless gay people are biologically incapable of producing children.
And let's face facts - closeted gay people have been producing kids for millennia.
So - homosexuality in itself cannot possibly be dangerous to society.
What would be accurate is this:
"Homosexuality is dangerous to society, when everyone becomes gay and penises and vaginas cease to function properly".
In that hypothetical situation, there is a danger to society. However, as homosexuality is not common enough to pose any threat to human existence, I think that it's safe to say that it's not a danger.
Think of it this way - a teaspoon of Ribena dropped into the River Avon is not going to make everything taste of blackcurrant, right?
Therefore it's not accurate to say that Ribena is a danger to the taste of water in the Somerset region.
Latest Posts
Society & Culture1 min ago
ChatterBank6 mins ago
Employers To Move Jobs Abroad...who'd...
News8 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.