Cover On Central Heating Boiler
Home & Garden0 min ago
How Was This Ever Going To Be A 'silent Rally'?
125 Answers
How damaging does this reflect on Tommy Robinson?
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
No, I didn't Garaman. So you've caught me out as being lazy, and a liar to boot.
I did find at the time i made the promise Anne Marie Waters' prescription:
http://
I largely agree with her, although I'd put her final bullet point ("Acknowledge the problem") as my first.
I'm probably for detention for the 23,000 "known" wolves we can't deport, but I want to read up on the use of that policy during "The Troubles" before I commit to it.
I did find at the time i made the promise Anne Marie Waters' prescription:
http://
I largely agree with her, although I'd put her final bullet point ("Acknowledge the problem") as my first.
I'm probably for detention for the 23,000 "known" wolves we can't deport, but I want to read up on the use of that policy during "The Troubles" before I commit to it.
'
High life
Taki, The Spectator
3 June 2017
"........................ well, I won’t be writing about the high life this week, but scum life instead. And I’ll tell you why: those innocent young children slaughtered by that Islamist scumbag in Manchester, that’s why. Those sweet young lives deserved better, and what drives me to tears is that none of this had to happen — not in Paris, Brussels, Berlin, Boston, Orlando, London or anywhere else where Islamist scum has murdered and maimed the innocent and defenceless.
It does not require a functioning occipital lobe to point the finger at the guilty party: political correctness. During the second world war, anyone under the slightest suspicion of having sympathies for the Axis powers was immediately interned. At times they went overboard, as, for example, when Oswald and Diana Mosley were jailed, a couple who were as likely to aid and abet Britain’s enemies as I am to change sex.
But here we have Angela Merkel handing out her usual baloney, having opened her borders to more than a million migrants, many of them posing as refugees. Or that other clown from Luxembourg, who I wish had been in Manchester last week and had lost a leg or two, or maybe his miserable life. And what about my golden boy Trump? What has he done lately? Instead of sticking to his guns and keeping Muslims out, as he pledged during his campaign, he goes to Saudi Arabia and inserts his orange face deep into the rectum of the man whose country started the whole murderous campaign against us by financing terror and the schools all over the world that teach it.
Actually, if it weren’t for political correctness, the luvvies and the usual suspects on the left, all those in Europe and in America who travelled to the Middle East to fight with Isis could simply have been immediately jailed. Instead of committing 60 — yes, 60 — policemen to monitor a suspect 24/7, and the incredible cost that surveillance involves, all we have to do is throw them into jail for the duration. No habeas corpus, no nothing. They have committed treason and treason deserves the ultimate penalty. But as we can no longer hang them, let’s at least jail them until they become too old to be a danger.
A government’s first task is to protect its subjects, and the governments of neither Europe nor America have done this. This Libyan thug had not only travelled to Libya, but had also been spotted spouting Islamist garbage in the middle of Manchester. Yet he was allowed to walk around undisturbed. Oh, how they must be laughing at us, those fat jihadists who order these massacres of children.'
High life
Taki, The Spectator
3 June 2017
"........................ well, I won’t be writing about the high life this week, but scum life instead. And I’ll tell you why: those innocent young children slaughtered by that Islamist scumbag in Manchester, that’s why. Those sweet young lives deserved better, and what drives me to tears is that none of this had to happen — not in Paris, Brussels, Berlin, Boston, Orlando, London or anywhere else where Islamist scum has murdered and maimed the innocent and defenceless.
It does not require a functioning occipital lobe to point the finger at the guilty party: political correctness. During the second world war, anyone under the slightest suspicion of having sympathies for the Axis powers was immediately interned. At times they went overboard, as, for example, when Oswald and Diana Mosley were jailed, a couple who were as likely to aid and abet Britain’s enemies as I am to change sex.
But here we have Angela Merkel handing out her usual baloney, having opened her borders to more than a million migrants, many of them posing as refugees. Or that other clown from Luxembourg, who I wish had been in Manchester last week and had lost a leg or two, or maybe his miserable life. And what about my golden boy Trump? What has he done lately? Instead of sticking to his guns and keeping Muslims out, as he pledged during his campaign, he goes to Saudi Arabia and inserts his orange face deep into the rectum of the man whose country started the whole murderous campaign against us by financing terror and the schools all over the world that teach it.
Actually, if it weren’t for political correctness, the luvvies and the usual suspects on the left, all those in Europe and in America who travelled to the Middle East to fight with Isis could simply have been immediately jailed. Instead of committing 60 — yes, 60 — policemen to monitor a suspect 24/7, and the incredible cost that surveillance involves, all we have to do is throw them into jail for the duration. No habeas corpus, no nothing. They have committed treason and treason deserves the ultimate penalty. But as we can no longer hang them, let’s at least jail them until they become too old to be a danger.
A government’s first task is to protect its subjects, and the governments of neither Europe nor America have done this. This Libyan thug had not only travelled to Libya, but had also been spotted spouting Islamist garbage in the middle of Manchester. Yet he was allowed to walk around undisturbed. Oh, how they must be laughing at us, those fat jihadists who order these massacres of children.'
tommy was on stage shared by black protesters on that march, i watched him and others give a speech telling them not to cause trouble .
he or the organisers cannot be held responsible for a few who caused trouble.
but then look at the ANTIFA demonstrators across the road wearing balaclavas and head scarfs covering their faces and throwing bricks and hurling abuse.
why to hell is tommy robinson allways getting it in the neck
yet another left wing media attack. one sided biased reporting
he or the organisers cannot be held responsible for a few who caused trouble.
but then look at the ANTIFA demonstrators across the road wearing balaclavas and head scarfs covering their faces and throwing bricks and hurling abuse.
why to hell is tommy robinson allways getting it in the neck
yet another left wing media attack. one sided biased reporting
As usual, when andy-hughes is stuck for an answer he, as yesterday 16:19 and now to me, cries that the post isn't addressing the OP - which I suggest few questions do over 100 posts.
Actually at the same time Garaman asked v_e for recommendations for dealing with the threat of Islamic terrorism and I posted the extract from Taki's article to give a lead.
Actually at the same time Garaman asked v_e for recommendations for dealing with the threat of Islamic terrorism and I posted the extract from Taki's article to give a lead.
diesedick //tommy was on stage shared by black protesters on that march, i watched him and others give a speech telling them not to cause trouble .
he or the organisers cannot be held responsible for a few who caused trouble.
but then look at the ANTIFA demonstrators across the road wearing balaclavas and head scarfs covering their faces and throwing bricks and hurling abuse.
why to hell is tommy robinson allways getting it in the neck
yet another left wing media attack. one sided biased reporting
07:34 Thu 15th Jun 2017 //
The reason why ‘Tommy Robinson’ gets it in the neck is because he creates these situations.
If you have a savage dog and you let it run in the street without a lead, it’s no use shrugging your shoulders and saying it’s not your fault when it bites someone.
If ‘Tommy Robinson’ didn’t instigate these protests, then others would not gather and cause trouble in return.
If others cause trouble, then ‘Tommy Robinson’ is not responsible – but he is, so he must accept the criticism that goes hand in hand with his self-appointed ‘defence’ nonsense.
he or the organisers cannot be held responsible for a few who caused trouble.
but then look at the ANTIFA demonstrators across the road wearing balaclavas and head scarfs covering their faces and throwing bricks and hurling abuse.
why to hell is tommy robinson allways getting it in the neck
yet another left wing media attack. one sided biased reporting
07:34 Thu 15th Jun 2017 //
The reason why ‘Tommy Robinson’ gets it in the neck is because he creates these situations.
If you have a savage dog and you let it run in the street without a lead, it’s no use shrugging your shoulders and saying it’s not your fault when it bites someone.
If ‘Tommy Robinson’ didn’t instigate these protests, then others would not gather and cause trouble in return.
If others cause trouble, then ‘Tommy Robinson’ is not responsible – but he is, so he must accept the criticism that goes hand in hand with his self-appointed ‘defence’ nonsense.
from andy-hughes, //If you have a savage dog and you let it run in the street without a lead, it’s no use shrugging your shoulders and saying it’s not your fault when it bites someone.//
Oddly enough I used an analogy very similar to that when talking here about radical Islamists recently. Problem is we do let them run the streets, and we do say it's not our fault when they bite people - and that's what Tommy Robinson is, quite rightly, objecting to.
Oddly enough I used an analogy very similar to that when talking here about radical Islamists recently. Problem is we do let them run the streets, and we do say it's not our fault when they bite people - and that's what Tommy Robinson is, quite rightly, objecting to.
Naomi – and in the interests of balance, I think the analogy applies equally as you used it in terms of Islamists.
But dieseldick was asking why ‘Tommy Robinson’ gets it in the neck – so I believe the analogy applies perfectly well to him. ‘Mr Robinson’ is right to criticise, although I disagree with the methods he uses – but my point is that he cannot stand with a confused look on his face and a pretence of innocence, when he is criticised for the mayhem he wilfully incites.
But dieseldick was asking why ‘Tommy Robinson’ gets it in the neck – so I believe the analogy applies perfectly well to him. ‘Mr Robinson’ is right to criticise, although I disagree with the methods he uses – but my point is that he cannot stand with a confused look on his face and a pretence of innocence, when he is criticised for the mayhem he wilfully incites.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.