ChatterBank1 min ago
Houses Raided And Six Far-Right Group Members Arrested.
147 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-52 31213/F ive-men -woman- arreste d-Natio nal-Act ion-rai ds.html
Have they been arrested because it is feared that they may be a threat to our safety or because they are members of a banned group?
Can't be the former because the police have insisted there is no threat to public safety.
Have they been arrested because it is feared that they may be a threat to our safety or because they are members of a banned group?
Can't be the former because the police have insisted there is no threat to public safety.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// That was tried in 1930 jth, not of course on a parliamentary or law of the land basis but tried nevertheless by a British political party. Go on guess who was proscribed and by whom.//
yeah I thought of that .... but there was a law - Public Order Act 1936 which criminalised the wearing of uniforms - ( ie black shirts ) and since it lasted until the seventies I dont THINK it proscribed organisations
Oswald Mosley was interned under DORA 1939 - defence of the realm act - sweeping emergency powers during the war
which we arent REALLY talking about
just saying
as ever there is so much bullshot on AB
so those are my guesses and I bet you didnt guess I wouild say that
yeah I thought of that .... but there was a law - Public Order Act 1936 which criminalised the wearing of uniforms - ( ie black shirts ) and since it lasted until the seventies I dont THINK it proscribed organisations
Oswald Mosley was interned under DORA 1939 - defence of the realm act - sweeping emergency powers during the war
which we arent REALLY talking about
just saying
as ever there is so much bullshot on AB
so those are my guesses and I bet you didnt guess I wouild say that
Once again Pee Pee You are using the right letters and words......... but not necessarily in the right order. ( With apologies to Eric Morecambe.)
In 1930, 10 years after the foundation of the CPGB and 12 years after the Labour Party introduced individual membership, the Labour Party produced its first ‘proscribed list’, although it was not issued under a section of the constitution.
By this means, members of proscribed organisations became ineligible for individual membership of the party and local Labour branches were prohibited from affiliating to proscribed organisations; these included the influential National Unemployed Workers’ Movement and the National Minority Movement. At the time when the restrictions were introduced, it became a condition of Labour Party membership that members already active in proscribed organisations had to leave them forthwith. Nevertheless, it took a further three years’ intense activity by the Labour Party right before it was able to change the constitution to prohibit individual members of the CPGB from joining as and remaining members of the Labour Party.
In 1930, 10 years after the foundation of the CPGB and 12 years after the Labour Party introduced individual membership, the Labour Party produced its first ‘proscribed list’, although it was not issued under a section of the constitution.
By this means, members of proscribed organisations became ineligible for individual membership of the party and local Labour branches were prohibited from affiliating to proscribed organisations; these included the influential National Unemployed Workers’ Movement and the National Minority Movement. At the time when the restrictions were introduced, it became a condition of Labour Party membership that members already active in proscribed organisations had to leave them forthwith. Nevertheless, it took a further three years’ intense activity by the Labour Party right before it was able to change the constitution to prohibit individual members of the CPGB from joining as and remaining members of the Labour Party.
AOG, and others. This was in yesterdays Guardian and appears to be about a National Action supporter :::::
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ uk-news /2018/j an/02/s elf-pro claimed -nazi-g oes-on- trial-o ver-ral lies-in -northe rn-engl and
What a charmer !
https:/
What a charmer !
Gromit
/// Just out of interest, what is it you like about National Action?
Why do you think them being proscribed is unjust? ///
As I have pointed out before there is nothing I like about National Action, simply because I do not know enough about them and I hazard a guess that many on here do not also.
All I know is the fact by their very name they are an action group but against what? There are many action groups but it seems that it is only those on the right that are scrutinised and condemned.
Shouldn't groups be allowed to protest against the changes that we can see being made to this country of ours?
/// Just out of interest, what is it you like about National Action?
Why do you think them being proscribed is unjust? ///
As I have pointed out before there is nothing I like about National Action, simply because I do not know enough about them and I hazard a guess that many on here do not also.
All I know is the fact by their very name they are an action group but against what? There are many action groups but it seems that it is only those on the right that are scrutinised and condemned.
Shouldn't groups be allowed to protest against the changes that we can see being made to this country of ours?
AOG......" because I do not know enough about them and I hazard a guess that many on here do not also"
Can I suggest you immediately get to know more about NA....everything you need is right here ::::
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Natio nal_Act ion_(UK )
The earlier link that I posted at 09:29 should also be highly informative. Whoever this man is, he has already confessed to be a recruiter for NA.
Here is an extract ::::
"The jury was played a recording of the Blackpool demonstration in which a man could be heard describing Jewish people as “parasites” and arguing that Britain had taken the wrong side in the second world war. “We should have been fighting the communists,” he said. “Instead we took the side of the communists and fought the national socialists who were there to remove Jewry from Europe once and for all.”
After reading both of these links, you should be left in no doubt as to why the organisation is proscribed.
Can I suggest you immediately get to know more about NA....everything you need is right here ::::
https:/
The earlier link that I posted at 09:29 should also be highly informative. Whoever this man is, he has already confessed to be a recruiter for NA.
Here is an extract ::::
"The jury was played a recording of the Blackpool demonstration in which a man could be heard describing Jewish people as “parasites” and arguing that Britain had taken the wrong side in the second world war. “We should have been fighting the communists,” he said. “Instead we took the side of the communists and fought the national socialists who were there to remove Jewry from Europe once and for all.”
After reading both of these links, you should be left in no doubt as to why the organisation is proscribed.
Terrible words indeed Mickey......but have we not had, and indeed in some quarters allowed, "speakers" with loud hailers on our streets calling for death to the kuffars and non believers with calls to arms and jihad. Now these people are supposedly, entitled to free speech, and any objection to their hateful rhetoric is dismissed with a view that the more we allow them to spew their bile the less effect it is likely to have on our very discerning listeners. Indeed to stop them would only result in their views being seen as somehow enticing and their proscription would result in them being viewed, by the easily led, as martyrs of some sort.................Funny old world.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.