ChatterBank0 min ago
May Looks To The Public For Support For Deal
In an attempt to go over the heads of MPs, a majority of whom have threatened to reject the agreement when it is voted on next month, Mrs May will take questions on BBC Radio 5 live and the BBC News Channel.
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-463 12909
Firstly, I’d be interested to know how the questions will be filtered and chosen, and secondly, if she gets the response she wants, what then? Will she go back to parliament and say, “There you are. A dozen or so selected members of the public say they agree with me”?
So what? What difference does she think that will make?
https:/
Firstly, I’d be interested to know how the questions will be filtered and chosen, and secondly, if she gets the response she wants, what then? Will she go back to parliament and say, “There you are. A dozen or so selected members of the public say they agree with me”?
So what? What difference does she think that will make?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Just putting her case to the people.
Can’t really see why that would be an issue.
Don’t worry unless there’s a referendum it won’t matter ;-)
She probably feels buoyed by the fact that her personal rating has actually risen this week: people don’t like the sight of a mere state school girl being hassled by public school toffs, whatever they may think of the deal ...
Can’t really see why that would be an issue.
Don’t worry unless there’s a referendum it won’t matter ;-)
She probably feels buoyed by the fact that her personal rating has actually risen this week: people don’t like the sight of a mere state school girl being hassled by public school toffs, whatever they may think of the deal ...
I think that she believe that her lies will get through.
She seems to be of the opinion that if she says ‘it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal’ often enough the stupid gullible people will believe it’s true even though it’s patently clear it is the worst possible deal. Far far worse than a no deal.
Someone with more time and expertise than the present shower needs to step up and give an analysis of the effects of her deal with that of a no deal.
She seems to be of the opinion that if she says ‘it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal’ often enough the stupid gullible people will believe it’s true even though it’s patently clear it is the worst possible deal. Far far worse than a no deal.
Someone with more time and expertise than the present shower needs to step up and give an analysis of the effects of her deal with that of a no deal.
/// She seems to be of the opinion that if she says ‘it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal’ often enough the stupid gullible people will believe it’s true ... ///
She's only following the example set by the Brextremists - for 40 years they've been saying "the EU is bad" until 17m ended up believing them.
She's only following the example set by the Brextremists - for 40 years they've been saying "the EU is bad" until 17m ended up believing them.
Brexit has been exposed as a horrible mess, as most of us predicted.
For all that I think the PM has made a series of misjudgments along the way, she’s basically been left to do an almost impossible job: three ardent Brexiteers if you remember were put in key posts in 2016, but they manifestly failed to make any progress and she had to step in and effectively replace David Davis as Britain’s chief negotiator.
No outcome was ever going to seem attractive. Ireland is the real problem, as warned all along.
Now where are Liam Fox’s 40 trade agreements before Breakxit? For example?
For all that I think the PM has made a series of misjudgments along the way, she’s basically been left to do an almost impossible job: three ardent Brexiteers if you remember were put in key posts in 2016, but they manifestly failed to make any progress and she had to step in and effectively replace David Davis as Britain’s chief negotiator.
No outcome was ever going to seem attractive. Ireland is the real problem, as warned all along.
Now where are Liam Fox’s 40 trade agreements before Breakxit? For example?
//Brexit has been exposed as a horrible mess, as most of us predicted//
Ah, AB's greatest sage. "Brexit" - rather than its executors - is a horrible mess?
Dear me.
I've resigned from the golf club. I'll settle my bar bill (quite big I'm afraid to say), and leave, I hope, on good terms. Might want to come back and play a round with a few mates from time to time.
Understand I will pay more as an outsider than as a member.
Is this a massive simplification of a complicated issue?
Yes. But given our mutual interests in trade, defence and other matters it ought with common sense and good-will be capable of a tidier (i.e.less messy) resolution.
I
Ah, AB's greatest sage. "Brexit" - rather than its executors - is a horrible mess?
Dear me.
I've resigned from the golf club. I'll settle my bar bill (quite big I'm afraid to say), and leave, I hope, on good terms. Might want to come back and play a round with a few mates from time to time.
Understand I will pay more as an outsider than as a member.
Is this a massive simplification of a complicated issue?
Yes. But given our mutual interests in trade, defence and other matters it ought with common sense and good-will be capable of a tidier (i.e.less messy) resolution.
I
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.