Film, Media & TV0 min ago
What Are Your Thoughts On This?
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/a v/healt h-46634 595/sho uld-the -nhs-pa y-for-t ransgen der-fer tility- treatme nt
My belief is that no. They should not pay for transgender fertility treatment.
My belief is that no. They should not pay for transgender fertility treatment.
Answers
at a time when NHS is stretched trying to treat the very ill...no kind of vanity surgery should be offered... cosmetic or otherwise.. it is not a right to parent a child.... even without transgender complication s... the sick should have priority over everything
07:05 Tue 01st Jan 2019
Should the NHS pay for lung cancer treatment, for smokers and ex-smokers, but deny fertility treatment to transgender people even though in terms of cost to the NHS the latter is tiny, tiny, tiny?
It's like someone earning £3,000 a month, who spends £1,000 on their mortgage, £400 on travel costs, £500 on groceries, £70 on cigarettes, £100 on beer/wine...and 60p per month on chewing gum deciding to give up chewing gum because the money could be better spent.
It makes very little financial sense.
It's like someone earning £3,000 a month, who spends £1,000 on their mortgage, £400 on travel costs, £500 on groceries, £70 on cigarettes, £100 on beer/wine...and 60p per month on chewing gum deciding to give up chewing gum because the money could be better spent.
It makes very little financial sense.
Prudie
This isn't about transgender people who were born male. It's about transgender people who were born female. In the example in the question - women were having their eggs frozen pre-op.
Those who were born men cannot do that.
I could understand (but not agree with) the argument that there should be no fertility treatment on the NHS, but disagree that we should build inequality into the system. The rules that are there focus on clinical results, and are not based on ethical principles.
This isn't about transgender people who were born male. It's about transgender people who were born female. In the example in the question - women were having their eggs frozen pre-op.
Those who were born men cannot do that.
I could understand (but not agree with) the argument that there should be no fertility treatment on the NHS, but disagree that we should build inequality into the system. The rules that are there focus on clinical results, and are not based on ethical principles.
I don't think fertility treatment should be on the NHS budget. Doesn't seem the sort of thing it was created for, which was disease cures and prevention. Not yearned for wishes.
I can understand for compassionate reasons one might offer a couple having fertility issues a certain amount of help conceiving a first child, but it should be a separate issue, a different budget, if offered at all.
I can understand for compassionate reasons one might offer a couple having fertility issues a certain amount of help conceiving a first child, but it should be a separate issue, a different budget, if offered at all.
If they are going to offer fertility treatments to everyone else, it seems wrong not to offer it to transgender people who are a tiny fraction of the population. Being transgender should not fundamentally affect your rights and entitlements as citizens.
Like others, though, I have mixed feelings about fertility treatments in general being offered on the NHS. If we're going to take the challenge of climate change seriously, we need to make a difficult decision about whether or not we maintain policies that increase the UK's birth rate.
Like others, though, I have mixed feelings about fertility treatments in general being offered on the NHS. If we're going to take the challenge of climate change seriously, we need to make a difficult decision about whether or not we maintain policies that increase the UK's birth rate.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Transgender people who freeze their eggs or sperm are at liberty to arrange for a surrogate done through a proper agency or whatever official body that exists. They should also have to pay for it themselves.
It’s not like they were going for cancer treatment and froze them because of the treatment.
But TBH I don’t think much more than clomid should be the NHS’s fertility treatment.
Three rounds of clomid then either childlessness, adoption or private funding.
It’s not like they were going for cancer treatment and froze them because of the treatment.
But TBH I don’t think much more than clomid should be the NHS’s fertility treatment.
Three rounds of clomid then either childlessness, adoption or private funding.