Spectator - Christmas Crossword -...
Crosswords1 min ago
Why You Shouldn't Be A ***
141 Answers
https:/
Someone who wants to join a political position should probably not repeatedly punch someone for pouring a drink over them. He's an antagonistic ***.
Someone who wants to join a political position should probably not repeatedly punch someone for pouring a drink over them. He's an antagonistic ***.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Peace lily
You certainly have a selective perspective when it suits your agenda. Do you study closely the video clip several times.? The Indian was being interviewed by YL. He (YL) had a microphone in his right hand. Whilst YL was talking in an animated way the Indian suddenly threw the shake. Their was NOBODY standing behind the Indian at all. Therefore he wasn't surrounded. YL's minders did what any professional bodyguard would of done. They neutralised the attacker by pouncing on him to prevent further assault .YL was dragged away by his minders as well. Lot of shouting and confusion but the Indian chap was the antagoniser here whatever way you want to spin it.
You certainly have a selective perspective when it suits your agenda. Do you study closely the video clip several times.? The Indian was being interviewed by YL. He (YL) had a microphone in his right hand. Whilst YL was talking in an animated way the Indian suddenly threw the shake. Their was NOBODY standing behind the Indian at all. Therefore he wasn't surrounded. YL's minders did what any professional bodyguard would of done. They neutralised the attacker by pouncing on him to prevent further assault .YL was dragged away by his minders as well. Lot of shouting and confusion but the Indian chap was the antagoniser here whatever way you want to spin it.
"Well that'd be the Good Friday Agreement foxed if you were in charge then lol :/"
Think that's well and truly set in stone now. We're living in 2019 not the troubles.
Now.. we all know you don't like people telling what to do, but i'd appreciate it if you would quit with the :/ faces, the christ on a bike forms of venting frustration, and try have a mature discussion? It's antagonistic when every answer from you gives an impression of 'urgh'. IF that is the case, just go. I'm not telling you what to do, i'm just trying to advise how to have a more friendly, meaningful discussion with me.
Think that's well and truly set in stone now. We're living in 2019 not the troubles.
Now.. we all know you don't like people telling what to do, but i'd appreciate it if you would quit with the :/ faces, the christ on a bike forms of venting frustration, and try have a mature discussion? It's antagonistic when every answer from you gives an impression of 'urgh'. IF that is the case, just go. I'm not telling you what to do, i'm just trying to advise how to have a more friendly, meaningful discussion with me.
//Question Author"was the antagoniser "
Disagree, the Indian looking chaps perspective is warped by what he's heard and seen LY do in the media, on YL's youtube channel etc..
the way LY was talking to the Indian looking chap was preachy, and forceful.//
Oh God. You know how the Asian mind works now do you.? Don't tell me you were actually there.
Most prospective canvassers with political aspirations do become preachy when they discuss and inform their manifestos with people in the street.
Disagree, the Indian looking chaps perspective is warped by what he's heard and seen LY do in the media, on YL's youtube channel etc..
the way LY was talking to the Indian looking chap was preachy, and forceful.//
Oh God. You know how the Asian mind works now do you.? Don't tell me you were actually there.
Most prospective canvassers with political aspirations do become preachy when they discuss and inform their manifestos with people in the street.
Your absurdity grows with every single answer Spath.
No-one is required to express themselves the way you seem to think they ought to. This is a public forum, post on it and accept that, or do not, it's all the same to me.
If I find someone's point valid then I'll tell them so, if not they will know that also. You might be horrified to know that I genuinely do restrain myself quite considerably when responding to you Spath, there is a lot I would like to say but I'm too mature and polite to do so, so sorry you'll just have to deal with me posting as I see fit. You are of course welcome to do likewise, I would never try to stifle any argument or debate contrary to mine, I can accept it without getting as upset as it appears to make you.
No-one is required to express themselves the way you seem to think they ought to. This is a public forum, post on it and accept that, or do not, it's all the same to me.
If I find someone's point valid then I'll tell them so, if not they will know that also. You might be horrified to know that I genuinely do restrain myself quite considerably when responding to you Spath, there is a lot I would like to say but I'm too mature and polite to do so, so sorry you'll just have to deal with me posting as I see fit. You are of course welcome to do likewise, I would never try to stifle any argument or debate contrary to mine, I can accept it without getting as upset as it appears to make you.
"ou must agree that this is no way for two adults to behave?"
I totally agree. It's just one is a random member of the public, the other is a convicted aspiring MEP. I'm not worried about the milkshake thrower being in the European parliament.
People laughed at the idea of trump being president. People laugh at the idea of TR actually becoming MEP.
I totally agree. It's just one is a random member of the public, the other is a convicted aspiring MEP. I'm not worried about the milkshake thrower being in the European parliament.
People laughed at the idea of trump being president. People laugh at the idea of TR actually becoming MEP.
