Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
President Takes Anti Malarial - Is Dettol Next?
144 Answers
The President cleared the room when he admitted taking hydroxychloroquine.
He had also found a doctor to prescribe it
and MY question is : if a relative did that and died - would you complain to the authorities ( GMC and courts here ) that the doctor had NOT acted in the patients ( your relative that is!) best interests and should pay you ( the estate ) much moolah and lose his licence
Note to help posters - hydroxyChlor does NOT have a licence to be used in warding off covid
He had also found a doctor to prescribe it
and MY question is : if a relative did that and died - would you complain to the authorities ( GMC and courts here ) that the doctor had NOT acted in the patients ( your relative that is!) best interests and should pay you ( the estate ) much moolah and lose his licence
Note to help posters - hydroxyChlor does NOT have a licence to be used in warding off covid
Answers
Now you're just being silly again. I think we're better off without you.
14:42 Tue 19th May 2020
a update - one of the authors of the "HO-Chlor kills!" or [ take it and you will DDDIIIEEE!]
has withdrawn his signature
A paper has to be pretty flawed to make some one unwrite a paper. it was a look-back and I thought the authors had looked back themselves in the notes
Instead they used prescribing info gained from the pharma companies. so I think I agree -
Hydroxychlorquine kills - now goes back into the non-proven box
has withdrawn his signature
A paper has to be pretty flawed to make some one unwrite a paper. it was a look-back and I thought the authors had looked back themselves in the notes
Instead they used prescribing info gained from the pharma companies. so I think I agree -
Hydroxychlorquine kills - now goes back into the non-proven box
I dont think it is false spicey
there are only seven kinds of medical naughtiness in medical paper writing - no I will not specify ( false data - data pruning - ghost authorship, funny reviewing etc )
and this APPEARS to be he thought they had done it one way and when he found out they had done it another way he said o no my signature is NOT on that !
which I am afraid is near to gift authorship - naughty naughty any author is meant to have greater monitor and control than that
The problem with crappy or cross-eyed medical reporting (cow dung cures schizophrenia shock) is that the result cannot be striking or important or else the above happens
( and certainly NOT commercially important)
there are only seven kinds of medical naughtiness in medical paper writing - no I will not specify ( false data - data pruning - ghost authorship, funny reviewing etc )
and this APPEARS to be he thought they had done it one way and when he found out they had done it another way he said o no my signature is NOT on that !
which I am afraid is near to gift authorship - naughty naughty any author is meant to have greater monitor and control than that
The problem with crappy or cross-eyed medical reporting (cow dung cures schizophrenia shock) is that the result cannot be striking or important or else the above happens
( and certainly NOT commercially important)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.