ChatterBank0 min ago
Who's In Favour Of Mandatory Face Coverings?
Looks like we'll have no option after 24 July - or is this the time for civil disobedience?
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-533 97617
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by diddlydo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I’ve been using a face mask for a while now when going grocery shopping, not that I have noticed that many other people doing so. I welcome the decision, it has not gone away and there will always be people who do not agree with this new rule. However, how is it safe to go and sit in an indoor restaurant with other people with germs in the air, surely it should apply to all in door facilities.
I’m in favour of mandatory face masks because it takes the confusion out of it. We now all know we have to wear one in the situations specified.
If I’m wearing one then I may be preventing some else catching it, and likewise if other people wear them then they may be preventing me from catching it.
I don’t like wearing a face mask (who does?) but will happily do so.
If I’m wearing one then I may be preventing some else catching it, and likewise if other people wear them then they may be preventing me from catching it.
I don’t like wearing a face mask (who does?) but will happily do so.
Whether Keir Starmer could or couldn't do better strikes me as less than relevant. We'll never know anyway, unless Covid-24 strikes. But it feels like the wrong question. Is Johnson doing the best possible job? If not, could anybody else do better? And, if not, then what is even the point of Government and holding it to account?
Defending Johnson's mistakes because somebody else would be equally incompetent seems defeatist.
Defending Johnson's mistakes because somebody else would be equally incompetent seems defeatist.
"I also 'lip read' because of hearing issues and I've not had anyone shouting and screaming at me, methinks over exagerrated."
Well me thinks wrong. How arrogant are you.
My daughter is profoundly deaf - she cannot hear not hearing issues. Perhaps you should understand peoples problems before making bland nasty comments like that for your own agenda.
Despicable.
Well me thinks wrong. How arrogant are you.
My daughter is profoundly deaf - she cannot hear not hearing issues. Perhaps you should understand peoples problems before making bland nasty comments like that for your own agenda.
Despicable.
Yes deafness is a severe problem which has obviously not been at all considered. Making an exemption for the deaf person would, of course, make no difference whatsoever. I note in the "public transport" face covering legislation there is an exemption for somebody accompanying a deaf person so that the deaf person can lip read them. But that means the deaf person must be accompanied all the time and their companion would have to transmit everything that anybody wants to tell the deaf person. Yet another "back of a fag packet" measure made as a reaction to the baying Twitface mob.
//My daughter is profoundly deaf - she cannot hear not hearing issues. Perhaps you should understand peoples problems before making bland nasty comments like that for your own agenda. //
I am also profoundly deaf on my right side and hard of hearing on my left. Despicable? Unlikely, rather more realistic? Still not had anyone screaming and shouting at me. Have been lip reading for over 60yrs
Arrogant, very probable ☺☺☺
I am also profoundly deaf on my right side and hard of hearing on my left. Despicable? Unlikely, rather more realistic? Still not had anyone screaming and shouting at me. Have been lip reading for over 60yrs
Arrogant, very probable ☺☺☺