bobbisox "Don't know the answer but it will no doubt 'save money' by not having post mortems ( just a thought)"
If there is a risk that the dead person had covid, then PM's are even more dangerous for the person doing it, also for many falilies, the thought of a PM is distressing, may be difficult given their religion.
I think we may be wandering from the point here.... (what? on Ab? never!)
I think that there are two hares running.
Its usually/often the case that the cause of death is broadly known to the family. They know their loved one is terminally unwell or at least are aware that death is a likely outcome, or the end is a sudden one but the cause is clear. In such cases I am genuinely unsure why it should be upsetting to the family if covid is added provided this is not for criminal reasons or it would besmirch the persons reputation and provided that the real cause of death is mentioned. We also know that causes of death on death certificates are not wonderfully accurate anyway. When my husband died, my lovely GP actually told me what she would put on the cert and asked if it was acceptable.
Hare two is Covid and cause of death and again yes we know that cause of death on death certs is not accurate in this respect which is why it was changed to reflect this and is now death within 28 days of a positive test....more objective but no guarantee of accuracy either.
But IT DOESN'T MATTER because excess deaths are excess deaths, the number is huge and I for one doubt that it was done by russian spies with poisoned umbrellas