Is Is Fair For Hairdressers To Charge...
Body & Soul1 min ago
Sarah Everard Vigil
I find it ironic that all those critisising the police trying to disperse thes women are all too ready to support the police in this situation when other groups get together for any other reason.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dave50. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
andy-hughes
roy - //
anneasquith
We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us .
_______________________________
So you aim that at the SNP also, anne? //
Although you moan abvout the So Rule roy, you keep breaking it!!
_______________________
Why do you constantly claim to be intelligent?
That (even if I did subscribe to the so rule) isn't the so rule.
It was clearly asking...that's 'asking' anne if she would also include the SNP in her ''We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us'' statement.
Clearly from her reply she is giving the SNP a free pass on forgetting about the pandemic in pursuit of freedom.
roy - //
anneasquith
We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us .
_______________________________
So you aim that at the SNP also, anne? //
Although you moan abvout the So Rule roy, you keep breaking it!!
_______________________
Why do you constantly claim to be intelligent?
That (even if I did subscribe to the so rule) isn't the so rule.
It was clearly asking...that's 'asking' anne if she would also include the SNP in her ''We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us'' statement.
Clearly from her reply she is giving the SNP a free pass on forgetting about the pandemic in pursuit of freedom.
I know some will moan about 'Spiked-online' being the source but
https:/
https:/
roy - // Why do you constantly claim to be intelligent? //
I don;t ever 'claim to be intelligent' - constantly or otherwise, so please don't make up nonsense to insult me.
//That (even if I did subscribe to the so rule) isn't the so rule.
It was clearly asking...that's 'asking' anne if she would also include the SNP in her ''We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us'' statement. //
It's actually a text-book definition of the So Rule!
You added something in to anne's post which she had not stated, then you used your addition to criticise her, and you started your imagined and created statement with the word "So ...".
As I have pointed out many times, the So Rule refers to when a poster commences a post with "So what you are saying is ..." or a shortened of it, and then adding in something that the original poster has not said at all, and then going on to criticise the poster for what they have not said.
You are a constant prime example - when you learn to stop making things up and then using them to criticise posters, I won't draw attention to it.
It is a frivolous aside, but in fact, adding your own slant into someone else'e post and then criticising them for something they did not say, is bad debating, and unfair to the poster having their opinion altered without their knowledge, and then criticised because you want them to have said something else - so you pretend they have so you can have a pop at them for it.
You stop doing it, I'll stop correcting you - simple.
I don;t ever 'claim to be intelligent' - constantly or otherwise, so please don't make up nonsense to insult me.
//That (even if I did subscribe to the so rule) isn't the so rule.
It was clearly asking...that's 'asking' anne if she would also include the SNP in her ''We can’t forgets pandemic when it suits us'' statement. //
It's actually a text-book definition of the So Rule!
You added something in to anne's post which she had not stated, then you used your addition to criticise her, and you started your imagined and created statement with the word "So ...".
As I have pointed out many times, the So Rule refers to when a poster commences a post with "So what you are saying is ..." or a shortened of it, and then adding in something that the original poster has not said at all, and then going on to criticise the poster for what they have not said.
You are a constant prime example - when you learn to stop making things up and then using them to criticise posters, I won't draw attention to it.
It is a frivolous aside, but in fact, adding your own slant into someone else'e post and then criticising them for something they did not say, is bad debating, and unfair to the poster having their opinion altered without their knowledge, and then criticised because you want them to have said something else - so you pretend they have so you can have a pop at them for it.
You stop doing it, I'll stop correcting you - simple.
Andy-hughes,
Conservative MP Caroline Nokes, who chairs the Commons Women and Equalities Select Committee, tweeted.: "In this country we police by consent - not by trampling the tributes to a woman who was murdered and dragging other women to the ground. Badly misjudged by #metpolice."
Home Office minister Victoria Atkins told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show the scenes were "incredibly upsetting", adding that it was "right" the force "explain their actions - both to the democratically elected politicians and the public".
The home secretary Priti Patel has called for an independent investigation into the Met Police's handling of a vigil for Sarah Everard.
And that is just the Government. The London Mayor, Keir Starmer, Ed Davey have all voiced their horror at the tactics deployed.
The only good outcome is that this will see Ms *** moved on.
Conservative MP Caroline Nokes, who chairs the Commons Women and Equalities Select Committee, tweeted.: "In this country we police by consent - not by trampling the tributes to a woman who was murdered and dragging other women to the ground. Badly misjudged by #metpolice."
Home Office minister Victoria Atkins told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show the scenes were "incredibly upsetting", adding that it was "right" the force "explain their actions - both to the democratically elected politicians and the public".
The home secretary Priti Patel has called for an independent investigation into the Met Police's handling of a vigil for Sarah Everard.
And that is just the Government. The London Mayor, Keir Starmer, Ed Davey have all voiced their horror at the tactics deployed.
The only good outcome is that this will see Ms *** moved on.
who takes a sign like this and does this at a vigil.
https:/
https:/
bobbinwales
Women did not go to Clapham Common yesterday to fight the police. That is a totally disingenuous portrayal of events.
They went all day to take flowers and take quiet reflection on what had happened.
A lone woman violently murdered by a policeman. To be met by a violent group of police men was undoubtedly the wrong response by the power that be at the Met.
Women did not go to Clapham Common yesterday to fight the police. That is a totally disingenuous portrayal of events.
They went all day to take flowers and take quiet reflection on what had happened.
A lone woman violently murdered by a policeman. To be met by a violent group of police men was undoubtedly the wrong response by the power that be at the Met.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.