News0 min ago
The Donald Is Back!
Great speech, straight from the heart, no baloney, & no autocue. Sleepy Joe, be afraid.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ video/d onald-t rump-fo rmer-us -presid ent-giv es-his- first-s peech-i n-washi ngton-d c-since -leavin g-offic e-12659 735
https:/
Answers
The voters in America will once again have to make a choice. It will not be influenced by the narcissist rage of a few wannabe opinion brokers on an obscure website in a foreign Country. They will have to choose between a candidate with a brash and and guileless personality who has America's best interests, and therefor theirs, at heart and as the core of his...
18:53 Wed 27th Jul 2022
Spucerack,
The Republicans didn’t want to be involved.
// The House of Representatives passed a bill to create a bipartisan independent commission to investigate the attack, modeled after the 9/11 Commission, but it failed due to a filibuster by Republicans in the Senate. The House then formed a select committee led by seven Democrats and two Republicans. //
The Republicans didn’t want to be involved.
// The House of Representatives passed a bill to create a bipartisan independent commission to investigate the attack, modeled after the 9/11 Commission, but it failed due to a filibuster by Republicans in the Senate. The House then formed a select committee led by seven Democrats and two Republicans. //
Further proof that you are so fond of your own voice, Fatticus, that you just don't listen to what people say to you.
You repeatedly assert that I'm a Boris Johnson supporter.
I keep telling you, I've never supported him.
Calm down a bit, listen to what people say and try to understand.
I do support Trump. Proud to support him.
And if you're referring to Alex Jones's court case, I am on his side.
The Judge is an absolute disgrace.
You repeatedly assert that I'm a Boris Johnson supporter.
I keep telling you, I've never supported him.
Calm down a bit, listen to what people say and try to understand.
I do support Trump. Proud to support him.
And if you're referring to Alex Jones's court case, I am on his side.
The Judge is an absolute disgrace.
//So like Alex Jones you believe that the Sandy Hook Massacre was a hoax?//
Aha, I see you follow the Cathy Newman method of debate.
Good for you, ignore all the ridicule you get.
//Explain to me why the Judge in the current case against Jones(which he’s had to backtrack on completely) is a disgrace?//
A) She's as thick as 2 short planks. (not her fault, to be fair)
B) She hates Jones with a vengeance and makes no attempt to hide it. (As a lot of people do, probably you included. She should have recused herself. She didn't. That's why she's a disgrace in my opinion)
Backtracked? You must have believed things when you were young and stupid which you look back on now and crin....hang on, most people believed things when they were young and stupid which they look back on now and cringe.
Spicerack
//Backtracked? You must have believed things when you were young and stupid which you look back on now and crin....hang on, most people believed things when they were young and stupid which they look back on now and cringe.//
Lol, is that a veiled and pathetic attempt in saying that yes, in your view, Sandy Hook WAS a hoax?
Just a simple yes or no will do, even you can manage that, surely?
//Backtracked? You must have believed things when you were young and stupid which you look back on now and crin....hang on, most people believed things when they were young and stupid which they look back on now and cringe.//
Lol, is that a veiled and pathetic attempt in saying that yes, in your view, Sandy Hook WAS a hoax?
Just a simple yes or no will do, even you can manage that, surely?
> And if you're referring to Alex Jones's court case, I am on his side.
OK, I'm on the side of the parents of a child killed at Sandy Hook, who for 10 years had to endure Alex Jones calling them liars, until eventually the only way they could stop him was to sue him for defamation. Which they have now successfully done.
During the case, Jones testified that the shooting was "100% real" and that it was wrong to call it a hoax. Such a shame that he couldn't have figured that out in the ten years beforehand.
I'm not on Jones's side and I'm not on the judge's side, I'm on the parents' side. Why position this as Jones versus the judge, rather than Jones versus the parents he'd been defaming for ten years?
OK, I'm on the side of the parents of a child killed at Sandy Hook, who for 10 years had to endure Alex Jones calling them liars, until eventually the only way they could stop him was to sue him for defamation. Which they have now successfully done.
During the case, Jones testified that the shooting was "100% real" and that it was wrong to call it a hoax. Such a shame that he couldn't have figured that out in the ten years beforehand.
I'm not on Jones's side and I'm not on the judge's side, I'm on the parents' side. Why position this as Jones versus the judge, rather than Jones versus the parents he'd been defaming for ten years?