Is someone having a laugh??

[R1Geezer]

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1 319373,00.html
They must have known that releasing this waste of air would enrage the public. So why do the authorities in this country seem determined to wind up the people that pay their wages?

[Oneeyedvic]

Is it because of that good old British tradition of requiring proof before you can convict someone?

Of course, we could just round up everyone we think may be dodgy and keep them locked up - that would please most people.

[jake-the-peg]

Interesting that Sky News feels it relevant to say that he had �17,000 in his posession but not relevant to mention that the judge said there were no grounds to detain him.

They've certainly wound you up haven't they?

A real "cornflake spitter" -

You missed the expression "Right thinking people"

Go on you know you want to use it!

[Gromit]

The problem with having laws is that you have to keep to them.

If you start ignoring the law because someone dresses daft or has a silly beard, then you turn into a despotic regime like they have in Saudi Arabia.

Would you sooner have that?

[jake-the-peg]

Whatever

Muslims often have large quantities of cash due to their restrictions on using banks.

Remember when the police raided a house in Forest gate shooting one

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5077198.stm

Which they ended up appologising for?

Much was made at the time about a large quantity of cash there too �38,000.

I'm sure this guy is a nasty piece of work but you seem to want to ignore the law and engage in some sort of dictatorship.

I can't imagine how frightened you must be to want that

[Quinlad]

I give up. Was it from selling ice cream?

[Ric.ror]

To be honest I try to see both sides but I cannot help thinking that a trial and curfew restrictions cost an awful lot more than a one way ticket to Jordan. But then I dont make the laws in this country and neither, so it would seem to the government

[R1Geezer]

Ok so he's released on bail, with conditions etc. what I don't understand is if he's inncoent then why is he not just released full stop? Bail seems to imply some charge pending, if that's true the the original question remains why let him out now?

Still I don't often agree with this goverenment but it would have been prefereable if we could send the sh1t bag back to Jjordan to be banged up there where he is convicted. But no, our laws of ooman rights mean that the Jordanian jail is some how not up to our own cushy standards so we keep the slime ball. The rest of the world must be pi55ing itself!

What do you think the frogs would do??

[Gromit]

The �170,000 was 'donations' collected during his preaching. The money was found at his home during a police raid. He is unlikely to have used a regular bank account as it would have been 'frozen' by the UK authorities.

One of these 'donations' was �805 in an envelope labled "For the Mujahedin in Chechnya".

He was never charged for any offense related to this money. There is not a law which says you cannot have large amounts of money at your home.

[whiffey]

He's out, but can't do much, we'll even have to do his shopping for him (and pay for it probably too).

Never mind, on the bright side you can bet he is being very very closely watched and I for one hope a stray bullet from a sniper rifle heads his way.

[Gromit]

Thinking of Forest Gate, why was there no prosecution for the child porn found on one of the brother's computer?

"The Crown Prosecution Service announced last night that it had advised the Metropolitan Police not to charge the 23-year-old supermarket employee. After the development, he has no blemish on his character.

A CPS spokesman said 44 indecent images of children had been found in the memories of a computer, an external hard drive and a mobile phone recovered during the raid.

Twenty-three were "embedded" images, which could have been inadvertently downloaded on the back of other computer files. Twenty-one - all on the hard drive and the mobile - were "deleted". The CPS spokesman said: "To transfer to the phone, the suspect would have to have specialist knowledge. There was no evidence that Mr Kahar had possession of, or access to, equipment or the technical knowledge to do so."

[sp1814]

Raggy Roman

You know that child porn thing?

I've got a copper mate who told me a rumour (which seems to have been subsequently borne out) that there was no porn on the PC at all.

In addition, one of the lads was shot by a copper, rather than accidentally offloading the gun on himself.

This always happens - negative stories get out (via the Daily Mail usually) about Muslims, and even though they are later proven untrue, the seed of disinformation is sewn in the public mind, where eventually it becomes 'the truth'.

[Quinlad]

Raggy, it's not the accused who's denying it. Or a judge. Or a jury.

It's the CPS. Even the prosecutors are saying that the images won't have come from the accused.

You're still not buying that though?

[R1Geezer]

oi oi oi

this is about the question above, not some bl00dy chil porn
yellow card, now keep on the subject!

[R1Geezer]

can one of you lefties address my follow up points please. Is he remanded for something or not?