ChatterBank13 mins ago
Freedom of protest
35 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...st-yorkshire-11124524
Can anyone please explain why, if any indigenous group wants to stage a protest against the rise of Islam in this country, they are automatically called a 'Racist, Far Right Wing' group?
Are not the indigenous people of this country allowed to have their say, or even allowed to march through one of the cities of our country, that has more or less been taken over by peoples who are not native of this country?
Yet peoples of the Islam religion are allow to freely protest outside Mosques, calling for the murder of Jews etc and even allowed to abuse our troops on their return from war.
Can anyone please explain why, if any indigenous group wants to stage a protest against the rise of Islam in this country, they are automatically called a 'Racist, Far Right Wing' group?
Are not the indigenous people of this country allowed to have their say, or even allowed to march through one of the cities of our country, that has more or less been taken over by peoples who are not native of this country?
Yet peoples of the Islam religion are allow to freely protest outside Mosques, calling for the murder of Jews etc and even allowed to abuse our troops on their return from war.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I saw it called a right-wing group in that article, not a racist far-right one.
It's the truth, they are.
The MDL were there as well, but they are a tiny group so don't get a mention like the UAF does.
The EDL and MDL should be shunted to an island to get on with it in my opinion and leave the rest of us to just get on with living.
It's the truth, they are.
The MDL were there as well, but they are a tiny group so don't get a mention like the UAF does.
The EDL and MDL should be shunted to an island to get on with it in my opinion and leave the rest of us to just get on with living.
Mojo-jo-jo
Perhaps it does not say so in the article, but they have been described as 'racist' on numerous occasions, but how they can be, when Islam is a religion not a race.
I don't know whether or not you are English, but how else can we protest at the dilution of the English nation, if we are not to be labelled 'Right-Wing' or 'Racist'?
Perhaps it does not say so in the article, but they have been described as 'racist' on numerous occasions, but how they can be, when Islam is a religion not a race.
I don't know whether or not you are English, but how else can we protest at the dilution of the English nation, if we are not to be labelled 'Right-Wing' or 'Racist'?
123everton
In answer to your question 'can you be Muslim and British'.
Yes undoubtedly, but we are not talking 'British' in this instance we are talking 'English'. i.e. (English Defence League)
But since the wide majority of Muslims in this country are either Pakistani or of Pakistani descent, they are not part of the native inhabitants of England..
In answer to your question 'can you be Muslim and British'.
Yes undoubtedly, but we are not talking 'British' in this instance we are talking 'English'. i.e. (English Defence League)
But since the wide majority of Muslims in this country are either Pakistani or of Pakistani descent, they are not part of the native inhabitants of England..
sandyRoe
One can be so dangerously apathetic.
How can you positivity say that "That will never happen" have you any definite proof?
If one looks at the present birth rate amongst the 'non-whites' of this country, compared to those born to all 'white parents', the answer is that 'whites' in the future, will obviously become the minority, it is common sense.
One can be so dangerously apathetic.
How can you positivity say that "That will never happen" have you any definite proof?
If one looks at the present birth rate amongst the 'non-whites' of this country, compared to those born to all 'white parents', the answer is that 'whites' in the future, will obviously become the minority, it is common sense.
sp1814
You are getting more and more colour conscious.
Indigenous people of this country, = 'White English' (European).
Not 'White Polish' not 'White Eastern European' not even 'White Scottish'.
It was 123everton that introduced the colour 'Black'.
The indigenous population of England are White, this is a fact, and is not in anyway a slight towards Black people.
You are getting more and more colour conscious.
Indigenous people of this country, = 'White English' (European).
Not 'White Polish' not 'White Eastern European' not even 'White Scottish'.
It was 123everton that introduced the colour 'Black'.
The indigenous population of England are White, this is a fact, and is not in anyway a slight towards Black people.
Indigenous people of this country, = 'White English' (European).
Not 'White Polish' not 'White Eastern European' not even 'White Scottish'.
Oh you've got to be kidding now.
Why the exclusion of the Scots?
"As the present majority we are seemingly not allowed to protest on certain sensetive matters now"
No...a minority wanted to protest and there were allowed to do so.
Not 'White Polish' not 'White Eastern European' not even 'White Scottish'.
Oh you've got to be kidding now.
Why the exclusion of the Scots?
"As the present majority we are seemingly not allowed to protest on certain sensetive matters now"
No...a minority wanted to protest and there were allowed to do so.
Coobeastie
The answer lies in these 2 words 'freely protest'
The Muslim protests outside the mosques etc.were allowed without the huge intimidating police presence.
If the EDL had been allowed to march through the streets, who would it had been who started the rioting? yes the Muslims.
But then of course we could not have an equal huge police presence to keep them in check could we?
No, they would not stand for it, calls would go up for racial intimidation etc,etc.
The answer lies in these 2 words 'freely protest'
The Muslim protests outside the mosques etc.were allowed without the huge intimidating police presence.
If the EDL had been allowed to march through the streets, who would it had been who started the rioting? yes the Muslims.
But then of course we could not have an equal huge police presence to keep them in check could we?
No, they would not stand for it, calls would go up for racial intimidation etc,etc.