News2 mins ago
Is God Cruel?
81 Answers
Is God really to blame for such suffering?
According to investigators, evidence was found in the wreckage that pointed to sabotage by a terrorist bomb. When men fight against one another to further their own selfish interests, should God be held responsible for the harm it may bring to others? No! It should be expected that humans would not be immune to the consequences of what they do. The apostle Paul wrote: “Whatever a man is sowing, this he will also reap.” What is more, regarding the innocent victims of the cruel and irresponsible actions of others, says that “time and unforeseen occurrence befall them all.” Thus, a person may get hurt or even lose his life, not because God wants man to suffer but because, by chance, he is in the wrong place at the critical time.
Ecclesiastes 9:11( Galatians 6:7) Genesis 18:25)
If it were true that God causes children to die because he needs more angels in heaven, it would imply that he is unfeeling, even cruel. The Bible says otherwise. A compassionate father would not snatch a child away from its parents just so that he could enlarge his own family. Yet, no human parent has more compassion than GOD , whose dominant quality is love. His great love would never permit him to act in such a harsh way. (Job 34:10) (1 John 4:8) (ROMES.9.14-18)
According to investigators, evidence was found in the wreckage that pointed to sabotage by a terrorist bomb. When men fight against one another to further their own selfish interests, should God be held responsible for the harm it may bring to others? No! It should be expected that humans would not be immune to the consequences of what they do. The apostle Paul wrote: “Whatever a man is sowing, this he will also reap.” What is more, regarding the innocent victims of the cruel and irresponsible actions of others, says that “time and unforeseen occurrence befall them all.” Thus, a person may get hurt or even lose his life, not because God wants man to suffer but because, by chance, he is in the wrong place at the critical time.
Ecclesiastes 9:11( Galatians 6:7) Genesis 18:25)
If it were true that God causes children to die because he needs more angels in heaven, it would imply that he is unfeeling, even cruel. The Bible says otherwise. A compassionate father would not snatch a child away from its parents just so that he could enlarge his own family. Yet, no human parent has more compassion than GOD , whose dominant quality is love. His great love would never permit him to act in such a harsh way. (Job 34:10) (1 John 4:8) (ROMES.9.14-18)
Answers
-- answer removed --
God created all things.
Including Man.
And Man's evil ways.
God is omniscient. He knows everything.
He knows that Man will bomb and maim innocent people and children.
He knows when it's going to happen, because He is omniscient.
But He still lets those innocent people walk towards the bomb.
He lets the children get their legs blown off.
And He tells us that we, Mankind, should be compassionate and loving.
Why does He not tell us to follow His own example and, frankly, not give a flying f**k about other people?
Including Man.
And Man's evil ways.
God is omniscient. He knows everything.
He knows that Man will bomb and maim innocent people and children.
He knows when it's going to happen, because He is omniscient.
But He still lets those innocent people walk towards the bomb.
He lets the children get their legs blown off.
And He tells us that we, Mankind, should be compassionate and loving.
Why does He not tell us to follow His own example and, frankly, not give a flying f**k about other people?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The more I think about it, the more it makes sense that the Bible is packed with hyperbole about how amazing and fearsome and all powerful he is and (where they went a bit o.t.t.) all the stuff about how vengeful and unforgiving he is.
Put into the context of trying to convert Romans and Pagans, who were into a whole pantheon of deities, to this new-fangled one God, it all makes sense. It's like trying to persuade the population of the world to ditch the 27 varieties of coffee they like to drink, from time to time and convert to Bigbucks all year round.
Just sales & marketing patter then, so maybe we shouldn't spend too much time or energy analysing it?
Put into the context of trying to convert Romans and Pagans, who were into a whole pantheon of deities, to this new-fangled one God, it all makes sense. It's like trying to persuade the population of the world to ditch the 27 varieties of coffee they like to drink, from time to time and convert to Bigbucks all year round.
Just sales & marketing patter then, so maybe we shouldn't spend too much time or energy analysing it?