Crosswords0 min ago
Prince Harry
485 Answers
There has been talk in the press lately about him having lied on his visa form to gain entry to the USA, could he be stopped from re entering after the coronation?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fourteen85. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Louis aged 5 was discretely removed from part of the service. Archie barely 4 and Lilibet 2 are too young to attend such an event. As non working royals H and M would not have been on the balcony and would not have a carriage ride. I don't think Meghan ever accepted or expected she and H would always be behind the Wales family at formal functions.
https:/
All pre-planned apparently
All pre-planned apparently
MissT - // The reason I think (and I only think!) she was a willing partner is because she accepted the job, she didn't resign, and when the bubble burst she accepted hush money. //
There we have it.
I am not a bully, I was certainly not bullying naomi.
I simply took issue, as i have done many many times in the past, with her way of stating her views based on media information, as though they are facts derived from inside information.
She has now conceded that she was merely offering her opinions the same as the rest of us, and has robustly defended herself, as I would expect her to - but there was no 'bullying' involved.
You have accused me of 'lecturing' - guilty, I try not to, but I know I do sometimes.
You have also maligned my integrity - not guilty - but my point is, you are happy to challenge when something comes across that you don't agree with, but when I and others do it, you perceive it as 'bullying'.
To repeat my earlier point - we are post as we wish, we are all subject to Site Rules, we can all contact the Ed if we feel things are not right.
But to draw a line - I am not a bully, and I hope that you can take a step back and understand the legitimate challenges to an opinion couched as fact, is a perfectly normal and acceptable aspect of debate.
There we have it.
I am not a bully, I was certainly not bullying naomi.
I simply took issue, as i have done many many times in the past, with her way of stating her views based on media information, as though they are facts derived from inside information.
She has now conceded that she was merely offering her opinions the same as the rest of us, and has robustly defended herself, as I would expect her to - but there was no 'bullying' involved.
You have accused me of 'lecturing' - guilty, I try not to, but I know I do sometimes.
You have also maligned my integrity - not guilty - but my point is, you are happy to challenge when something comes across that you don't agree with, but when I and others do it, you perceive it as 'bullying'.
To repeat my earlier point - we are post as we wish, we are all subject to Site Rules, we can all contact the Ed if we feel things are not right.
But to draw a line - I am not a bully, and I hope that you can take a step back and understand the legitimate challenges to an opinion couched as fact, is a perfectly normal and acceptable aspect of debate.
retrocop - // 2years ago a certain mod would of pulled this thread long ago. How times change. I wonder why.//
You have no idea which Mods delete which threads, or for what reason, because that is known only to the Ed and team.
But you know that, because I've told you numerous times before, yet you still peddle this piffle, for reasons of your own.
You have no idea which Mods delete which threads, or for what reason, because that is known only to the Ed and team.
But you know that, because I've told you numerous times before, yet you still peddle this piffle, for reasons of your own.
