Prince Harry

[fourteen85]

There has been talk in the press lately about him having lied on his visa form to gain entry to the USA, could he be stopped from re entering after the coronation?

[MissTerious2]

But you haven't t called us stupid Andy. There's the difference.

[andy-hughes]

MissT - // But you haven't t called us stupid Andy. There's the difference. //

No, and I haven't accused you of 'supposition' either, which is actually the point I made, so pointing out what I didn't say doesn't really address what I actually did say.

[MissTerious2]

Accusing someone of supposition is not like calling someone stupid though.

[sandyRoe]

The powers that be might ask our American cousins to refuse to let him back in , on the principle it's better to have him inside the tent peeing out rather than outside peeing in.
Then again, maybe not.

[Zacs-Master]

I haven’t called anyone stupid.

[david small]

Naomi24 has given you all a clear and concise explanation of how and what occurred. She is not responsible for your lack of understanding.
Hypocrisy is alive and well in pecksniffian AB.

[andy-hughes]

david - // Naomi24 has given you all a clear and concise explanation of how and what occurred. She is not responsible for your lack of understanding.
Hypocrisy is alive and well in pecksniffian AB. //

And where exactly did naomi get her 'clear and concise explanation of how and what occured' from?

Has she some secret access to the parties involved, so she knows more than the rest of us?

Be honest, her account is based on her views, the same as mine, and everyone else's.

You may wish to elevate naomi and her views as though she is some sort of insider with knowledge none of us possess, but let's be real - she is offering her views which are no more or less valid or informed than anyone else's posting on here.

Just because you agree with her take on the issue doesn't make her any more correct than anyone else.

[andy-hughes]

MissT - // Accusing someone of supposition is not like calling someone stupid though. //

No, it's not, I entirely agree.

Does that mean that because you view my view as less serious, that it's automatically less valid?

I don't think so.

[MargoTester]

I thought this post was about Prince Harry

[andy-hughes]

Margo - // I thought this post was about Prince Harry //

Threads twist and turn as people think of other things to add in - twas ever thus.

Did you know - male sperm whales sing a song to attract a mate, and as the sound waves travel through the water, all the other males hear the first song and imitate it. As the mating season goes on, the song evolves and changes, and still every male adapts the changes, so that by the end of the season, the song they are all singing is exactly the same, but it bears no resemblance whatsoever to the song that started everything off.

The same thing happens to threads on the AB - without the mating bit at the end of course!

[MargoTester]

Andy I did actually- comes from watching too much David Attenborough:-)

[david small]

The marvellous, meticulous, AH in full flow. A wonderful experience for all to enjoy.

[andy-hughes]

david - //
The marvellous, meticulous, AH in full flow. A wonderful experience for all to enjoy. //

Very nice - but how about addressing your elevation of naomi and her take on Prince Andrew's behaviour?

[david small]

I do not need to alleviate naomi. She has the insight and the intelligence, the common sense, and the life experience to reach logical conclusions quite easily. Where as, you Andy dissect and interpret responses to questions quite impressively, though sometimes take them a little too literally. A master debater par excellence.

[MissTerious2]

I'm saying I find it odd that you have suddenly discovered it's a strange world and that you seriously can't believe that a royal has been defended for using prostitutes on this site.

But I fail to see why you think women should think differently to men about sex trafficking. can you explain? And I seriously wonder how you know that Andrew knew Victoria had been sex trafficked and that Eistein was a paedophile until this was all exposed.

[MissTerious2]

I lost some of my answer where I apologised. You didn't call me stupid. Just what I said

[MissTerious2]

Those two last posts to

[Peter Pedant]

Hazza is pretty challenged - History and Art O level ?

[Peter Pedant]

alleviate Naomi - hur hur hur

nd I seriously wonder how you know that Andrew knew Victoria had been sex trafficked

er excuse me - - just saying "I was sex trafficked" doesnt mean that er they were sex trafficked

I think that is why The Randy One gave his disastrous interview.
V Giuffre - yada yada
and he thought "oh I can do that!" - no sweat - pun intended
and The Prince said - "nichty yada yada ( and bear in mind she has to prove her case and I dont have to refute any of it"
and promptly slipped on his arriss

[MissTerious2]

To Zac.