Clarity Bloom Cbd Gummies (I've Tested)...
How it Works0 min ago
Do I Have to Believe Evolution?
350 Answers
Well,For 116 years it graced the halls of the National Museum of Wales at Cardiff—the fossilised skeleton of a 200m[illion]-year-old predator that once cruised the Jurassic seas,” says Britain’s newspaper The Guardian. “Then curators at Cardiff decided the remains of the ocean-going carnivore ichthyosaurus needed a brush up—and realised that they had been taken in.” “When we stripped off five layers of paint we found it was an elaborate forgery,” said conservator Caroline Buttler. “It was an amalgam of two types of ichthyosaurus plus a clever attempt at fake parts.” Instead of disposing of it, the museum will put it on display as an example of a fake fossil.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Elderman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
‘No we haven't stopped evolving’.
In the last two decades, about 19 million died from AIDS, and some 35 million now have the virus that causes it. Millions of children are left without parents—they died from AIDS. And untold numbers of babies are dying from AIDS, passed on to them when they were still in the womb.
More suffering is being inflicted on children in other ways. Citing information provided by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), England’s Manchester Guardian Weekly stated: “In the wars of the past decade, 2 million children have been killed, 4-5 million disabled, 12 million made homeless, more than 1 million orphaned or separated from their parents and 10 million psychologically traumatised.” Add to this an estimated 40 to 50 million abortions worldwide—every year!
Many view the future with foreboding. A group of scientists stated: “Human activities . . . may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know.” They added: “Even at this moment, one person in five lives in absolute poverty without enough to eat, and one in ten suffers serious malnutrition.” The scientists took the occasion to “warn all humanity of what lies ahead” and said: “A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”
Why has God allowed so much suffering and wickedness? How does he purpose to remedy the situation? And when?
In the last two decades, about 19 million died from AIDS, and some 35 million now have the virus that causes it. Millions of children are left without parents—they died from AIDS. And untold numbers of babies are dying from AIDS, passed on to them when they were still in the womb.
More suffering is being inflicted on children in other ways. Citing information provided by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), England’s Manchester Guardian Weekly stated: “In the wars of the past decade, 2 million children have been killed, 4-5 million disabled, 12 million made homeless, more than 1 million orphaned or separated from their parents and 10 million psychologically traumatised.” Add to this an estimated 40 to 50 million abortions worldwide—every year!
Many view the future with foreboding. A group of scientists stated: “Human activities . . . may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know.” They added: “Even at this moment, one person in five lives in absolute poverty without enough to eat, and one in ten suffers serious malnutrition.” The scientists took the occasion to “warn all humanity of what lies ahead” and said: “A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”
Why has God allowed so much suffering and wickedness? How does he purpose to remedy the situation? And when?
"But why should someone who questions a theory be labeled incompetent, uninformed, a ‘prisoner of old illusions and prejudices’?
Well, when the person concerned is you, it's because you fail to respond to requests for evidence, clearly don't understand the theory of evolution, as demonstated in your posted claims of "evolution says X" where X is completely contrary to the theory, and clearly is solely relying on creationist sites, it seems appropriate.
Well, when the person concerned is you, it's because you fail to respond to requests for evidence, clearly don't understand the theory of evolution, as demonstated in your posted claims of "evolution says X" where X is completely contrary to the theory, and clearly is solely relying on creationist sites, it seems appropriate.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Birdie:
No things have not got complicated. But you don’t seem to realise that it all ties in.
If some scientists are willing to speculate that life came from an extraterrestrial source, what is the basis for ruling out God as that source?
Anyway, I don’t see why I should do all the leg work. You have the internet and its resources just as I have.
But to put you out of your misery here is some research for you to do.
http://www..lbl.gov/S.../Archive/LSD-DNA.html
If you are into reading there is the New Scientist magazines – look at 30 May 2009 page 18 .
Scientific American – June 2007 p48
I could go on and on.
Why so many false stories? Basically because those doing the research need spectacular headlines in order to continue to receive funding. No headline – no funds. Therefore they are encouraged by the media both in print and electronic to provide dramatic stories.
No things have not got complicated. But you don’t seem to realise that it all ties in.
If some scientists are willing to speculate that life came from an extraterrestrial source, what is the basis for ruling out God as that source?
Anyway, I don’t see why I should do all the leg work. You have the internet and its resources just as I have.
But to put you out of your misery here is some research for you to do.
http://www..lbl.gov/S.../Archive/LSD-DNA.html
If you are into reading there is the New Scientist magazines – look at 30 May 2009 page 18 .
Scientific American – June 2007 p48
I could go on and on.
Why so many false stories? Basically because those doing the research need spectacular headlines in order to continue to receive funding. No headline – no funds. Therefore they are encouraged by the media both in print and electronic to provide dramatic stories.
