Origin Of Information.

[Theland]

I believe all information originates in a mind.
If you disagree with this, any examples?

[naomi24]

:o)

[THECORBYLOON]

The thread shows NAOMI as being the last poster at 9:38 this morning. This post should make it and the one before it , appear..

[THECORBYLOON]

Try again...

[THECORBYLOON]

I give up!

[nailit]

naomis 9:38 post showing here...

[THECORBYLOON]

That's only because of the additional answers I posted. The counter shows 143 answers including this one but there are 146.

[nailit]

It would appear that AB is a bit fooked up at the moment Corby :-(

[Khandro]

Could it be a now deceased old ABer playing games?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1170639/life-after-death-bible-news-jesus-christ-resurrection-christianity-afterlife-spt

[Theland]

It's a chicken and egg situation.
Information needed for life, life needed for information.
Darwinists are stumped, and you can check this out yourselves.
Unless of course, atheists have the answer.

[pixie374]

You don't need to have "the answer" to rule something out, theland. It is up to you to prove.
If I said that somebody had left socks in my living room, you would probably rule out that a unicorn had done it. Even without knowing the actual answer.
A chicken and egg situation doesn't exist. The chicken always comes before the egg- unless you are referring to dinosaur eggs....?

[pixie374]

Khandro, we know everyone isn't always the full ticket, but that isn't really relevant, here.

[naomi24]

Khandro, //Could it be a now deceased old ABer playing games?//

I’ve no idea what you mean, but that aside, if that has some substance, are you associating it with ‘God’ – and if so, why? We need to clarify your reasoning and your intent here.

[naomi24]

Theland at 22:24, no one has the answer. I asked you this elsewhere but received no response so I'll try again. Why is it so difficult for you to say you don't know - because actually, you don't?

[pixie374]

I think he is joking,tbh,naomi. A scientific being exceptionally unscientific. We have seen that on here a lot.

[Theland]

To take an educated guess as to how something happened in the past, we can look at what present day actions will produce the effect we are considering from the past.
Is that fair?

[naomi24]

Pixie, if you're talking about Khandro, he isn't a scientific being. Far from it. The airy-fairy world of most ethereal of philosophy is his preferred domain.

[naomi24]

Theland, I've read that three times....and I'm still scratching my head.

[pixie374]

No, naomi, khandro's link and further experience...
Theland, are educated guesses good enough for you? Wouldn't you prefer to actually know?

[naomi24]

Pixie, //No, naomi, khandro's link and further experience... //

?

[THECORBYLOON]

I think he is saying that if we have a theory about how something happened in the past, we can try to re-create the sequence of events and see what happens.