Donate SIGN UP

The Truth Of The Bible.

Avatar Image
Theland | 21:23 Thu 15th Jul 2021 | Religion & Spirituality
574 Answers
Only the bible describes the state of the world as we head into the End Times.
Only the bible has verifiable prophecies that can be tested for truth.
Is it not time to take the bible seriously?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 574rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Avatar Image
the letter in the Times today said: Bible Studies Dear Sir, Keith Elliott writes about the debate over the exclusive authority of the New Testament (credo letters). Christians believe that canonical scripture was established under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. That some books entered the canon 'by the skin of their teeth' is immaterial....
18:23 Tue 20th Jul 2021
looks like I'm going to get Smited!
"Only the bible describes the state of the world as we head into the End Times. " - err the planet is approx half way through it's life, how are we near the "end times" ?
Brilliant, first laugh the day.
'God is the Creator of, and is above and beyond gender'

Not another one who wants special toilets!
People on here seem to enjoy feeding this person's delusions by trying to find evidence with which to debunk them. Delusions can never be debunked because they are the creation of the disturbed mind, which changes and shapes the delusions to fit any eventuality.

The bible is simply the medium through which these delusions can be given some kind of credence in the mind of their creator. This medium could be any book - one of Jon Ronson's - The Psychopath test would be a good one - or some kind of fantasist tome like Isaac Asimov's work or that of Arthur C. Clarke.

Any of these would be a basis for belief in delusion. The bible is just another of these, and this post is the result.

Not a basis for serious argument.

Can I copy and paste that, Ringlet?
//People on here seem to enjoy feeding this person's delusions by trying to find evidence with which to debunk them. Delusions can never be debunked because they are the creation of the disturbed mind, which changes and shapes the delusions to fit any eventuality.//

The object isn't necessarily to save those who may already be beyond redemption but rather to minimise the spread to those who haven't been inoculated against the latest manifestation of delusion.
Rinlet: "People on here seem to enjoy feeding this person's delusions by trying to find evidence with which to debunk them. Delusions can never be debunked because they are the creation of the disturbed mind, which changes and shapes the delusions to fit any eventuality. " - yeah but it's fun isn't it?
Mibs, exactly.
Question Author
Oh dear atheist friends, (I hope), can we respectfully exchange ideas?
You debunk the bible and replace it with what?
Come on, atheists, answer the big questions without throwing custard pies.
Theland, I don't believe there is a god. What more can I say? I don't post about it a lot, I just occasionally respond to posts from others. Unfortunately, most of those who disagree with my view don't really seek to convince me that I am wrong by arguing rationally, they simply reiterate their belief. There's nothing really there to get your teeth into. I admit that I don't try to prove by logic that my belief is sound, but I do aften ask for clarification so that I can understand where the believers are coming from, and not often is there anything forthcoming (apart from a few exceptions).
Theland, nobody can answer the big questions. And I don't want to find a different book or dogma to replace the bible. I have a view based on my life experience and my reading. But I have not decided that one particular book answers all of life's questions. Can't you relax in the 'knowledge' that you will soon have the answers, without needing to get approval from a bunch of AB argumentatons?
Theland, in common with many, many others, I can't answer the 'big questions'. You seem to find it impossible to accept that YOU can't either, and just give us endless permutations of the 'the Bible says..' and 'God is...'. You have - never - provided any credible proof for the assertions that you make. Saying 'it's all there' and 'read the Bible properly' does nothing to strengthen your points (such as they are).
Question Author
Quite simply, the first attraction of the bible for me is prophecy.
How, other than miraculous, can you describe a book that contains forecasts that come true in the future long after they were written?
Theland, we both know that your assertions, in your last post, are your opinion only. Presenting things as facts doesn't make them so. 'Miraculous' is your interpretation, but that is all it is.
Theland; it could be coincidence. Could be that you are letting your wishes influence your judgment. Both of these options are more likely that genuine prediction of the future, which appears not to occur anywhere else other than in your chosen book.
Theland, 'forecasts' is not a good word to use. Weather forecasts are not prophecies or predictions, they are intelligent guesses based on available information and a scientific method of modelling future consequences.
'Miracle' should be a last resort, not the immediate conclusion to which you jump when you are puzzled.
this is like an awful biblical groaundhog day
day after day - like the brexit fredz of yore
the world is gonna end - I know it!

TTT we are approaching the end of times er because the Book of Revelation which I agree ws intended to be prophetic says so
- "yeah in two fouzan years the banks will fail - the crops will fail, the ground will burn, and four horsemen once of whom is Princess Anne..." not yeah, yea - known transcription error in 203 AD by heraclitus blightus, who had TERRIBLE handwriting - uncial handwriting of course and wonky calamus scriptorius

and some one wrote up the margin: free fousan ven....
// 'Miracle' should be a last resort, not the immediate conclusio//

erm well when Einstein wrote E = mc2 - he said to Maritsa ( his wifey silly !) Mein Gott Liebschon - it vill be a miracle if anyone oonderstonds diss...." - - strong German accent see?

yeah foo and when a student said to Eddington - "only free men in the world understand Einsteen, sir", Eddington ( Dr Who, Tom Courtenay, dat one) said " I am trying to think who the third is..."

david tennant - shape shifter

41 to 60 of 574rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Truth Of The Bible.

Answer Question >>