Film, Media & TV3 mins ago
Prince Andrew A ***?
89 Answers
https:/
Seems that way.
I feel the royal family should not be defending Andrew, and instead putting the spotlight on him, else it gives the impression the royals condone the behaviour.
If this was anyone else they would face retribution and trial.
Seems that way.
I feel the royal family should not be defending Andrew, and instead putting the spotlight on him, else it gives the impression the royals condone the behaviour.
If this was anyone else they would face retribution and trial.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
spath I'm not saying I don't believe you just that I can't access the headline. Your link does say /americas/jeffrey-epstein-trump-relationship-pedophile-money-wife-clinton-prince-andrew-sex-trafficking- but it doesn't put it into perspective. You don't have to prove it, I'm quite happy to take your word for it.
You *do* realise that Epstein and PA are 2 different people, don't you, spath?
It is quite possible/likely that Epstein *was* a paedophile; it doesn't follow that PA is and as already stated, having sex with a 17-year old doesn't signify much.
Many of the older blokes on this forum wouldn't knock back the opportunity of getting jiggy with a willing 17 year old.
You'll be the same when there is a greater difference between 17 y.o. and the age you are now....
It is quite possible/likely that Epstein *was* a paedophile; it doesn't follow that PA is and as already stated, having sex with a 17-year old doesn't signify much.
Many of the older blokes on this forum wouldn't knock back the opportunity of getting jiggy with a willing 17 year old.
You'll be the same when there is a greater difference between 17 y.o. and the age you are now....
