Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Rebranding Prince Andrew
If you were given the task of rebranding/rehabilitating Prince Andrew, how would you go about it?
https:/
Unless someone can think of some way to blame Harry and Meghan, I think this may be a non-starter.
https:/
Unless someone can think of some way to blame Harry and Meghan, I think this may be a non-starter.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Why does he need rebranding anyway? Apart from HRH The Queen they have all be at it over the years, male and female. His brother Charles first started dating Diana who was 17 at the time, when he was in his 30's I think. When the Queen passes away they should all be put out to grass and make Jacob Rees-Mogg President ha ha
The Queen's favourite son thing seems to arise from the earlier years of her reign when duties reduced the time she could spend with her first two children,as she was learning the job and still grieving for her father, by the time Andrew came along there were less pressures on her and she was probably in a better place emotionally. Maybe just a better chance of bonding
ynnafymmi
Apologies - Sunday morning ritual. Went to the gym...but I'll be honest with you, I'm going to ignore your post from 8.52 as responding to it might make this thread go off course.
naomi24 - you're right. He shouldn't be labelled a sex pest for having sex with a 17 year old in this country - that's not below the age of consent.
The problem is that if it's true that this girl was a victim of sex trafficking and PA was a willing participant, then his actions can be seen as 'less-than'innocent'.
Also his brand has been damaged by his continued relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction of procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18.
So it's not just the sex with a teenager who was allegedly coerced...but him flying to New York to go to dinner with Jeffrey Epstein that that's the problem
Apologies - Sunday morning ritual. Went to the gym...but I'll be honest with you, I'm going to ignore your post from 8.52 as responding to it might make this thread go off course.
naomi24 - you're right. He shouldn't be labelled a sex pest for having sex with a 17 year old in this country - that's not below the age of consent.
The problem is that if it's true that this girl was a victim of sex trafficking and PA was a willing participant, then his actions can be seen as 'less-than'innocent'.
Also his brand has been damaged by his continued relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction of procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18.
So it's not just the sex with a teenager who was allegedly coerced...but him flying to New York to go to dinner with Jeffrey Epstein that that's the problem
A man would be a sex pest if she was 80 and he was 81. Met my share of them through the years, before the law could be bothered you dealt with it either on your own or with the help of friends.
I could easily believe Andrew thought a girl would be willing, because why wouldn't she be, his position would not have been conducive to learning to recognise rejection. I do think he showed absolutely rubbish judgement in finding friends
I could easily believe Andrew thought a girl would be willing, because why wouldn't she be, his position would not have been conducive to learning to recognise rejection. I do think he showed absolutely rubbish judgement in finding friends
to bednobs [email protected]^^
SP, //Also his brand has been damaged by his continued relationship with Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction of procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18.//
And even more so I would guess by the news of his alleged friendship with Harvey Weinstein….
https:/
Foolish man.
And even more so I would guess by the news of his alleged friendship with Harvey Weinstein….
https:/
Foolish man.
he might feel at home governing Pitcairn, PP
https:/
https:/
naomi24
I'd be careful of jumping to conclusions.
A girl of 17 could be coerced (say) if the ringleader had compromising photos of the girl. His New York apartment was apparently bristling with CCTV.
I don't know the details of course - but this article is quite illuminating:
https:/
I'd be careful of jumping to conclusions.
A girl of 17 could be coerced (say) if the ringleader had compromising photos of the girl. His New York apartment was apparently bristling with CCTV.
I don't know the details of course - but this article is quite illuminating:
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.