Could it be true that the photo of Prince Andrew with the young lady (forget her name) could be fake. Since I heard about it I studied the photo and his left hand around her waist looks a bit iffy in terms of indenting and creasing. What do you think?
she certainly wouldn't have got the same length of sentence here - though my bet is she'll do about 3-5 and then be released. After all there was no murder involved - a 'spill all and we'll consider' and there is one ex-President to come under the Plod's beady eye....
It is not true to say it's easy to spot a fake photo. It's only easy if you have the original fake photo. In this case those involved only have a photo of the original, a photo that's been copied several times.
Imagine what would have happened if he'd come clean and said 'Yes, I knew her, yes I bonked her on three separate occasions, we were both willing, neither of us was underage, and we were both single'. Foolish man.
He met with her three times so after the first time she obviously went back for more. As far as I'm aware she was never underage and that wasn't what she accused him of. He should have come clean. He wouldn't have been in the situation he's in now and he'd have saved his mum and his brother a lot of money.
Andrew was accused of sexual abuse, not sex with an underage person. None of the 3 locations where sex is said to have taken place - Belgravia, New York and Litte St James - are in Florida.
//He met with her three times so after the first time she obviously went back for more//
She was a teenaged victim of sex trafficking, "owned" by one of the most well connected men in America. Do you really think she was in the position to say no?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.