zebo - // A good friend who is very hot on photography has said since it was first published that it was a fake, he actually copied it and then put lots of different people into it. Prince Andrew's defence never challenged it because he would have had to give evidence, there are so many people who have used the photo to make a lot of money. //
Since denial of the meeting of the two parties, which PA claimed, would have gone all the way to her case being dismissed, it would have been in his defence's interest to prove fakery, and if it could be proven, they would have done it.
They would have had the best most reputable photography bods lined up in court with irrefutable truth that the shot was a fake.
The fact that they did not suggests that proof was not available.