It’s Christmas Eve! What Are We...
ChatterBank3 mins ago
Fake Prince Andrew Photo
129 Answers
Could it be true that the photo of Prince Andrew with the young lady (forget her name) could be fake. Since I heard about it I studied the photo and his left hand around her waist looks a bit iffy in terms of indenting and creasing. What do you think?
Answers
Forensic photographic analysis comes in slightly cheaper than £12m. Move along now.
10:49 Tue 18th Oct 2022
I personally wouldn't classify Prince Andrew as a paedophile or a rapist.
He was a friend of Epstein and Maxwell (big mistake) and as such, he was offered the 'company' of a young woman as I'm sure many of their acquaintances were.
P. Andrew was not married and he was tempted.
As she didn't say no to him, (she did say she was never allowed to say no as she would be out on her ear) then this doesn't make him a rapist.
As she was 17 yrs old, this doesn't make him a paedophile, just a very stupid man.
If by paying the large amount of money to her meant that P. Andrew didn't have to go to America to face charges, then I'm sure that is what he was advised to do.
I'm not a fan of his, but I do think he paid a large price (not just money) for what he did/did not do.
Minty, don't compare Epstein and Maxwell to Brady and Hindley.
What they did was nearer to what the Wests did.
He was a friend of Epstein and Maxwell (big mistake) and as such, he was offered the 'company' of a young woman as I'm sure many of their acquaintances were.
P. Andrew was not married and he was tempted.
As she didn't say no to him, (she did say she was never allowed to say no as she would be out on her ear) then this doesn't make him a rapist.
As she was 17 yrs old, this doesn't make him a paedophile, just a very stupid man.
If by paying the large amount of money to her meant that P. Andrew didn't have to go to America to face charges, then I'm sure that is what he was advised to do.
I'm not a fan of his, but I do think he paid a large price (not just money) for what he did/did not do.
Minty, don't compare Epstein and Maxwell to Brady and Hindley.
What they did was nearer to what the Wests did.
// she wasn’t underage //
She was 17 when they hooked up in London, remember? That makes her underage. PA was in serious breach of English Law. Both PA and his legal team knew it!
The idea that he could have 'come clean' was not an option!
He went to great lengths to deny he'd ever met her. At one alleged meeting he even made out it couldn't possibly have been him since he was in an eaterie (Pizza Hut I think) with his children. Quite remarkable powers of recollection as this occurred well over a decade ago.
Why OPs on this board will not recognise he committed a serious sex crime is totally beyond me!
//that isn’t what she accused him of.//
I am well aware of this.
I have challenged all those who think that it was OK because she was only 17. It's not OK. He was guilty under English law of committing a serious crime. Had he come clean he would have been in more bother.
She was 17 when they hooked up in London, remember? That makes her underage. PA was in serious breach of English Law. Both PA and his legal team knew it!
The idea that he could have 'come clean' was not an option!
He went to great lengths to deny he'd ever met her. At one alleged meeting he even made out it couldn't possibly have been him since he was in an eaterie (Pizza Hut I think) with his children. Quite remarkable powers of recollection as this occurred well over a decade ago.
Why OPs on this board will not recognise he committed a serious sex crime is totally beyond me!
//that isn’t what she accused him of.//
I am well aware of this.
I have challenged all those who think that it was OK because she was only 17. It's not OK. He was guilty under English law of committing a serious crime. Had he come clean he would have been in more bother.
The age of consent in England and Wales is 16. This is the age when young people of any sex, gender or sexual orientation can legally consent to taking part in sexual activity. This means that sexual activity between two or more people is always unlawful if at least one of the people is under the age of 16.
// The age of consent in England is 16. She was not underage. //
The law is quite clear in this regard;
It is illegal for 16/17 year olds to engage in sexual activity with a person in a POSITION OF TRUST.
Hence his constant denials of ever having known Guiffre. If PA was not aware of the implications to 'come clean', his legal team most certainly did. To reiterate, had PA confessed to the episode that took place in London, UK police would have been compelled to investigate. Their findings would have inevitably led to the indictment of PA!
The law is quite clear in this regard;
It is illegal for 16/17 year olds to engage in sexual activity with a person in a POSITION OF TRUST.
Hence his constant denials of ever having known Guiffre. If PA was not aware of the implications to 'come clean', his legal team most certainly did. To reiterate, had PA confessed to the episode that took place in London, UK police would have been compelled to investigate. Their findings would have inevitably led to the indictment of PA!
-- answer removed --
Latest Posts
Crosswords5 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
I Post This Video Every Year . . .
ChatterBank13 mins ago
Road rules16 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.