Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
who would be a at fault if we had collided?
a coule of weeks ago, i was parked at the side of the road in designated bays that do not block the road at all...just behind me was a bus stop, which is not a bay sort, so the bus blocks the traffic for a moment...
as the bus had only just stopped, the way was clear for me to pull out...i checked my mirrors and there was no car beside the bus....so i pulled out...but as i did a car overtook the bus and flew round into my lane.
we didnt collide but they beeped me...
to my mind, i have right of way here and i cant be expected to know that they are going to overtake the bus...i know they might do, but i cant sit and wait on the offchance ... you could not see a car overtaking from where i was, until its out the other side so itd have made no difference anyway...
surely they should have been aware that there may have been a vehicle in front of the bus and been ready to pause...
they are the ones performing a manouvre and moving into the wrong lane.
but if theyd hit me...who would have been blamed?
i think them...but am i wrong?
cheers
as the bus had only just stopped, the way was clear for me to pull out...i checked my mirrors and there was no car beside the bus....so i pulled out...but as i did a car overtook the bus and flew round into my lane.
we didnt collide but they beeped me...
to my mind, i have right of way here and i cant be expected to know that they are going to overtake the bus...i know they might do, but i cant sit and wait on the offchance ... you could not see a car overtaking from where i was, until its out the other side so itd have made no difference anyway...
surely they should have been aware that there may have been a vehicle in front of the bus and been ready to pause...
they are the ones performing a manouvre and moving into the wrong lane.
but if theyd hit me...who would have been blamed?
i think them...but am i wrong?
cheers
Answers
JOKO YOU ARE STILL AT FAULT I HAVE TO CAPITALIZE THIS AS YOU ARE NOT TAKING HEED.
you are wrong you are wrong you are wrong!! is that enough to shut you up?
you are wrong you are wrong you are wrong!! is that enough to shut you up?
10:10 Wed 31st Aug 2011
it is the same, the vehicle travelling is passing an obstruction on your side and the driver is making the judgment that he can proceed to the end of the obstruction safely. that can happen in the exact same circumstance as yours. If I am behind a bus and the bus pulls over at a stop and I can see that road ahead is clear and that there is no oncoming traffic, I have a right to proceed with caution. any vehicle in front of the bus that decides to pull out when there is a bus behind them and they have 'blind spots' (your words) should not make any kind of manuvre until it is completely safe to do so
TWR - what?!
that makes no sense at all...please reread the posts properly...
how is my parking in a designated parking bay and accident waiting to happen?
and how can i have given the bus more room to park??
i was in no way blocking the bus or taking its room?
seriously your post makes absolutely no sense whatsover...
that makes no sense at all...please reread the posts properly...
how is my parking in a designated parking bay and accident waiting to happen?
and how can i have given the bus more room to park??
i was in no way blocking the bus or taking its room?
seriously your post makes absolutely no sense whatsover...
Joko, absolutely nothing personal and I am tring to give you some good advice but it seems you just want someone to tell you that you are right and I cannot do that I am afraid. If I were the investigating officer (should there had been a collision) I would e probably be holding you responsible and that's all I can say.
Please just put it down to an experience that has escapedinjury and think about it the next time you are in a similar position.
Please just put it down to an experience that has escapedinjury and think about it the next time you are in a similar position.
kakurol...i want proper answers thats all...most of the ones so far have been a snide attack or the result of scan reading the situation
no-one has yet actually explained why this person was totally justified in what they did and i am totally wrong.
i would like genuine - and convincing - answers from people who have clearly read the posts properly because if anyone can properly show me i an totally wrong then i will know for future reference
i am amazed people are defending this person...
no-one has yet actually explained why this person was totally justified in what they did and i am totally wrong.
i would like genuine - and convincing - answers from people who have clearly read the posts properly because if anyone can properly show me i an totally wrong then i will know for future reference
i am amazed people are defending this person...
peeler pal...thankyou for you input, but i dont think you have given me any advice at all, good or bad...you appear to twice now totally misread the post and misunderstood the situation, so forgive me if i cannot just take your word on this...
i am not arguing because i want to be told i am right - i am arguing because i want to be told why i am wrong - if i am???
can anyone actually explain that?
i am not arguing because i want to be told i am right - i am arguing because i want to be told why i am wrong - if i am???
can anyone actually explain that?
Joko you have had may answers but it seems that you are only taking what you want from them and trying to justify your actions. if people were trying to just throw pointless rants at you the first thing you would have been asked would be if you were a woman!
and if you are then that's just irony! But please just accept that you are in the wrong.
and if you are then that's just irony! But please just accept that you are in the wrong.