News3 mins ago
Should Boris resign?
This poll is closed.
- Yes - 102 votes
- 47%
- No - 81 votes
- 37%
- Who cares? - 20 votes
- 9%
- This doesn't apply to me - 8 votes
- 4%
- Who's Boris? - 6 votes
- 3%
Stats until: 18:57 Sat 21st Dec 2024 (Refreshed every 5 minutes)
© AnswerBank Ltd 2000 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Editor. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.How can you make a comparison with Jimmy Savile, Andy. He was total evil and that totally wiped out the so called good. The good was used to mask the evil for his own devices. In my mind Boris has done good things as a PM. But he's acted stupidly and without thought over the party issues - certainly not evilly
My grandad was the co-founder of the Stoke Mandeville games. He volunteered at SM and he reported Savile, at least twice.
Jimmy Savile invited both myself and my sister, separately (14,16 roughly) to "go and see his office".
Our grandad had warned us, and so we both declined.
I realise the point is, that doing good, does not make up for anything else. And I do agree.
Jimmy Savile invited both myself and my sister, separately (14,16 roughly) to "go and see his office".
Our grandad had warned us, and so we both declined.
I realise the point is, that doing good, does not make up for anything else. And I do agree.
Pat - I am not making a comparison, neither is naomi, it is the logic of her argument that gives rise to my use of Savile to make my point.
If you are going to set up a judgement of behaviour, which naomi has, then it should stand up to testing.
That means that it can stand a comparison - even an unpleasant one.
And if it doesn't, and the Savile example shows that it doesn't, then Boris doesn't get let off.
That's the point I am making.
It has nothing to do with Johnson or Savile, it's about testing a position, and seeing if it stands up.
And in my view, it does not.
So let's not get emotional about the example I am using, that's not the point.
It's about being rational and fair in all cases, not simply allowing one because it fits, and not the other because of the circumstances.
If you are going to set up a judgement of behaviour, which naomi has, then it should stand up to testing.
That means that it can stand a comparison - even an unpleasant one.
And if it doesn't, and the Savile example shows that it doesn't, then Boris doesn't get let off.
That's the point I am making.
It has nothing to do with Johnson or Savile, it's about testing a position, and seeing if it stands up.
And in my view, it does not.
So let's not get emotional about the example I am using, that's not the point.
It's about being rational and fair in all cases, not simply allowing one because it fits, and not the other because of the circumstances.
Basically,Should Boris retire because of this mess up. In my opinion, No. It's up to the party and if they think that overall he has been a good leader they may keep himi n And I hope they do. Unfortunately though the digging up dirt continues and the media will get great pleasure in seeing it does.