Donate SIGN UP

Racial abuse No.2

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:13 Wed 30th Nov 2011 | News
102 Answers
http://www.dailymail....ile-racist-abuse.html

Wow it's catching, I wonder who this phantom video camera man is, perhaps it's all a set-up by a certain newspaper?
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 102rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Daffy, I've just had a look on Youtube and the original was posted in 2009 without the bleeps
how isn't it? When you start treating people as individuals and not as part of a race / a gender / a whatever then any issue is with the individual. When you see someone as a white person or a black person, as a woman, as gay, as a Christian, that's when the -isms come into play. It really is that simple, just nobody seem prepared to do that and would rather suggest that everyone of that group acts the same!
Thanks TCL, so this was just copied and re-uploaded then?
Seems a bit odd and pointless to me.
Is it just me who thinks it may be the same person, this latest video was first put up 2 years ago so she would not have that little lad then.
they look very similar to me
Question Author
pa___ul3

/// Let's just start with a little tolerance of people from other countries who are doing what they can to make their lives better.///

Isn't that what we were doing when not only us, but other countries also, were carving out our colonies?

The indigenous peoples of those countries didn't care for our presence then, are we any different from them?
DrFilth, I actually thought that as well, the women are very much alike!!

I wouldn't be surprised.
/// Let's just start with a little tolerance of people from other countries who are doing what they can to make their lives better.///

Isn't that what we were doing when not only us, but other countries also, were carving out our colonies?

NO, i'm pretty sure their best interest was the last things in our minds before we raped, pillaged, murdered and enslaved millions in our quest for greed to see who could have the most dominions, protectorates, mandates, colonies and other territories

The indigenous peoples of those countries didn't care for our presence then, are we any different from them?

Our "presence" was at first a spectacle and once our true intentions were realised our "presence" was unwanted.

Have you seen the film "v'' where friendly aliens came from another planet and then it becomes apparent they're evil reptillians who want to enslave the whole planet as they eat human flesh and take all the water from every sea leaving earth an empty broken husk?

You could learn a lot from this.

We owe many people of many nations PLENTY as our great country was built on the blood, sweat tears and bones of many other global nations.
Question Author
Monkeyfun

/// Have you seen the film "v'', You could learn a lot from this. ///

I am not interested in fiction, only fact.

/// we raped, pillaged, murdered and enslaved millions in our quest for greed to see who could have the most dominions, protectorates, mandates, colonies and other territories ///

And what film was all this in then?
And what film was all this in then?

Ignorance is bliss, and selective memory is even more blissful so i've heard...

The "film" would be trans-atlantic slave trade, not exactly a hollywood blockbuster more a racebuster.

Maybe you've heard of it?
Monkey fun maybe they got the idea of rape and pillage after this incident

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Baltimore
"Conspiracy theories abound relating to the raid. It has been suggested Sir Walter Coppinger orchestrated the raid to gain control of the village from the local Gaelic chieftain, Fineen O'Driscoll. It was O'Driscoll who had licenced the lucrative pilchard industry in Baltimore to the English settlers."

Sir Walter Coppinger certainly doesn't sound like a north african name to me.

Besides slavery started in the 1400's, this incident claimed to have happened in 1631.

Does it sound like retribution or like a carefully planned and executed strategy from one of the "Great white masters"?
Question Author
Thanks for reminding me of those dastardly Barbary Pirates, DrFilth.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/...white_slaves_01.shtml

/// Considering what the number of sailors who were taken with each ship was likely to have been, these examples translate into a probable 7,000 to 9,000 able-bodied British men and women taken into slavery in those years. ///
By extension, for the 250 years between 1530 and 1780, the figure could easily have been as high as 1,250,000 - this is only just over a tenth of the Africans taken as slaves to the Americas from 1500 to 1800.

Would anyone blame this small number of retaliation after maybe seeing their villages and towns pillaged and burnt to a cinder, mothers and daughters raped and their brothers and fathers tortured, enslaved and taken away forever?

I wouldn't.
Question Author
Mostly done by their own race, who then sold them on to the highest bidder.
"perhaps it's all a set-up by a certain newspaper"?

Poor AOG is "evweboddy" pickin on you, dry your eyes and go and ask your mummy how to think for yourself its not hard.
-- answer removed --
Monkeyfun >>
"Conspiracy theories abound relating to the raid.

Besides slavery started in the 1400's, this incident claimed to have happened in 1631. <<



>> The first evidence of more complex craft that are considered to prototypes for later galleys comes from Ancient Egypt during the Old Kingdom (c. 2700-2200 BC). Under the rule of pharaoh Pepi I (2332-2283 BC) these vessels were used to transport troops to raid settlements along the Levantine coast and to ship back slaves and timber. During the reign of Hatshepsut (c. 1479-57 BC), Egyptian galleys traded in luxuries on the Red Sea with the enigmatic Land of Punt, as recorded on wall paintings at the Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari.


>> (2332-2283 BC) these vessels were used to transport troops to raid settlements along the Levantine coast and to ship back slaves and timber. <<
>> After the victorious Battle of Arginusae the freed slaves were even given Athenian citizenship in a move interpreted as an attempt to keep them motivated rowing for Athens. On two other occasions during the war, captured enemy galley slaves were given freedom by the victors.

In Sicily, the tyrant Dionysios (ca. 432–367 BC) once set all slaves of Syracuse free to man his galleys, employing thus freedmen, but otherwise relied on citizens and foreigners as oarsmen <<
>> Spartacus: leader of an army of runaway slaves that shook Italy in 73-71 BCE <<
from wiki
>> The Atlantic slave trade, also known as the trans-atlantic slave trade, refers to the trade in slaves that took place across the Atlantic ocean from the sixteenth through to the nineteenth centuries. The vast majority of slaves involved in the Atlantic trade were Africans from the central and western parts of the continent, who were sold by Africans to European slave traders, who transported them across the ocean to the colonies in North and South America. There, the slaves were forced to labor on coffee, tobacco, cocoa, cotton and sugar plantations, toil in gold and silver mines, in rice fields, the construction industry, timber for ships, or in houses to work as servants. <<

81 to 100 of 102rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Racial abuse No.2

Answer Question >>