ChatterBank2 mins ago
How Is Justice Being Served By Forcing A Decrepit Old Man, Deep In His Dotage, To Appear In Court?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Peter Pedant - //but for some reason we have to play out this charade in publis
so that sundry on lookers can exclaim: yes yes look ! Justice is being done //
It's not a 'farce' - it is due legal process.
If Lord Janner is excused his appearance, every defendant in the land will be reaching for the same excuse not to appear.
The entire point about the justice system is that it does not brook exceptions, everyone is treated the same, that is what justice means.
so that sundry on lookers can exclaim: yes yes look ! Justice is being done //
It's not a 'farce' - it is due legal process.
If Lord Janner is excused his appearance, every defendant in the land will be reaching for the same excuse not to appear.
The entire point about the justice system is that it does not brook exceptions, everyone is treated the same, that is what justice means.
-- answer removed --
\\\\\The entire point about the justice system is that it does not brook exceptions, everyone is treated the same, that is what justice means.\\\
Indeed it does. However if you can afford a smart Barrister and a "tame" medic, preferably a Psychiatrist then the medical opinion would be that the defendant was unfit for trial.
Indeed it does. However if you can afford a smart Barrister and a "tame" medic, preferably a Psychiatrist then the medical opinion would be that the defendant was unfit for trial.
Sandy...in short...yes, that is the way the law works in this case.
But his defence are trying to have their cakes and eat it. They tried to stop this procedure last week, because they said that it would not be fair on an old man with dementia, and that it would cause him "great distress" and yet in the same breath, they maintained that he was so far gone, he wouldn't know what was going on anyway !
In the end, his appearance only lasted 59 seconds and Janner did not appear to be unduly affected by his appearance in court after all.
The magistrates seem to be taking a hard line with this very serious case ::
"Deputy chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot refused the request, saying a hearing would only last "40 seconds" and the peer did not need to "gaze around the court".
She also warned Mr Ozin not to "mess around" after he argued for a "wide interpretation" of the law to allow Lord Janner to appear by video link.
But his defence are trying to have their cakes and eat it. They tried to stop this procedure last week, because they said that it would not be fair on an old man with dementia, and that it would cause him "great distress" and yet in the same breath, they maintained that he was so far gone, he wouldn't know what was going on anyway !
In the end, his appearance only lasted 59 seconds and Janner did not appear to be unduly affected by his appearance in court after all.
The magistrates seem to be taking a hard line with this very serious case ::
"Deputy chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot refused the request, saying a hearing would only last "40 seconds" and the peer did not need to "gaze around the court".
She also warned Mr Ozin not to "mess around" after he argued for a "wide interpretation" of the law to allow Lord Janner to appear by video link.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.