Sandy...in short...yes, that is the way the law works in this case.
But his defence are trying to have their cakes and eat it. They tried to stop this procedure last week, because they said that it would not be fair on an old man with dementia, and that it would cause him "great distress" and yet in the same breath, they maintained that he was so far gone, he wouldn't know what was going on anyway !
In the end, his appearance only lasted 59 seconds and Janner did not appear to be unduly affected by his appearance in court after all.
The magistrates seem to be taking a hard line with this very serious case ::
"Deputy chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot refused the request, saying a hearing would only last "40 seconds" and the peer did not need to "gaze around the court".
She also warned Mr Ozin not to "mess around" after he argued for a "wide interpretation" of the law to allow Lord Janner to appear by video link.