ChatterBank15 mins ago
Victory For Common Sense?
137 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.///Mamy, the thing about US restrooms, is that the cubicle sides and door end about 2 foot from the floor. there's absolutely no missing who's in the next trap.///
mamya is right, that does seem a bit of a poor design and, possibly, a bit of an exaggeration.....but if they are in the next cubicle what does it matter by 'what' means they are relieving themselves?
mamya is right, that does seem a bit of a poor design and, possibly, a bit of an exaggeration.....but if they are in the next cubicle what does it matter by 'what' means they are relieving themselves?
-- answer removed --
Svejk
The core issue with the bill is that it was worded in such a way that allowed anyone (not just churches) to cite the bill when discriminating against gay and transgendered people.
It would put disrimination on the statue books.
Whilst there are some who try to claim that gay people would use the laws to sue churches, the reality is that there are more important issues to address.
I know it's not like for like, but consider this - since the Equalities Act (Same Sex Marriage) was introduced...how many Anglican or Catholic Churches have been sued in the UK?
How many test cases have been launched to challenge the exemption of the Church?
The core issue with the bill is that it was worded in such a way that allowed anyone (not just churches) to cite the bill when discriminating against gay and transgendered people.
It would put disrimination on the statue books.
Whilst there are some who try to claim that gay people would use the laws to sue churches, the reality is that there are more important issues to address.
I know it's not like for like, but consider this - since the Equalities Act (Same Sex Marriage) was introduced...how many Anglican or Catholic Churches have been sued in the UK?
How many test cases have been launched to challenge the exemption of the Church?
-- answer removed --
divebuddy
Sorry, but you're conflating two completely different subjects.
One is a bill, which is a piece of State legislature, and the other is an ordinance.
Think of an ordinance as a bylaw, and a Bill as an Act of Parliament (I believe these are our nearest equivalents).
The two are completely separate from each other. The religious freedoms act has absolutely nothing to do with the so called 'bathroom bills'.
...because bathrooms have nothing to do with Christianity.
But now that we are thinking about this...is there anything in the Bible which specifically condemns transgendered people?
I'm assuming not.
...and surely that means that Christians shouldn't have a problem with them?
Sorry, but you're conflating two completely different subjects.
One is a bill, which is a piece of State legislature, and the other is an ordinance.
Think of an ordinance as a bylaw, and a Bill as an Act of Parliament (I believe these are our nearest equivalents).
The two are completely separate from each other. The religious freedoms act has absolutely nothing to do with the so called 'bathroom bills'.
...because bathrooms have nothing to do with Christianity.
But now that we are thinking about this...is there anything in the Bible which specifically condemns transgendered people?
I'm assuming not.
...and surely that means that Christians shouldn't have a problem with them?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --