News0 min ago
Migrants Entering Uk
Is there no way to send them back where they landed initially
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-kent -462530 19
https:/
Answers
bainbrig, you should apologise to emmie for calling her a liar, however you have proved your point about people coming here not wishing to debate. here's your first contribution to this thread. "Diddly. The proportion is about 80% who don’t give a $h1t, 20% like you (and me) who do. I find it easiest to let the miseries have the run of threads like these, as you...
16:46 Sun 18th Nov 2018
-- answer removed --
jim: "If you want to reduce illegal immigration, a good place to start is to focus on improving conditions as much as possible in the countries of origin. " - as far as we are concerned 99.99999% of the time they come from France. Under EUSSR regs they should apply there. What is wrong with France? What do the want so desperately to come to UK? Answers on a post card please to TTT co AB.
They are NOT stupid .They destroy all their papers and ID. They KNOW that if they have no papers or ID, so no way to know for CERTAIN where they came from., they CAN'T be sent back. If we sent them back to France they just try again and again until they get through. Once here they just disappear into the existing migrant community.The artical says that over 60 have already been sent back! it has been estimated that less than 1 in 6 get detected , the rest get in. So they just try again and again until they do get through.There was an interview with one on TV, he admitted he did not get through until his 8th attempt.
eddie: "They are NOT stupid .They destroy all their papers and ID. They KNOW that if they have no papers or ID, so no way to know for CERTAIN where they came from., they CAN'T be sent back. " - Cobras, if they arrived on a boat from Calais then we know for certain they came from France, send them back to France, we know at least that much. Hopefully mainland EUSSR will then learn to enforce the only useful law in the entire shambles.
bainbrig, you should apologise to emmie for calling her a liar, however you have proved your point about people coming here not wishing to debate. here's your first contribution to this thread.
"Diddly. The proportion is about 80% who don’t give a $h1t, 20% like you (and me) who do. I find it easiest to let the miseries have the run of threads like these, as you ain’t gonna change their minds! They KNOW they are right."
That was a well reasoned beginning to a debate in anybody's book, so let us continue. You say you give a $h1t about these people, would you mind telling us miseries, does this manifest in actual practical help or are you just talking $h1t?
diddlydo/bainbrig, Why are we to have compassion? France isn’t such a bad place to live, is it? Of course, the UK is a little better in that benefits are easier to access here – but compassion? Why? What horrors were they suffering in France?
Bainbrig, your inability to conduct a civil conversation exposes you as, among other things, an intellectual lightweight.
Eddie, //So they just try again and again until they do get through.//
I’m not sure what you’re suggesting. That we let them in first time because they’ll only keep trying?
Bainbrig, your inability to conduct a civil conversation exposes you as, among other things, an intellectual lightweight.
Eddie, //So they just try again and again until they do get through.//
I’m not sure what you’re suggesting. That we let them in first time because they’ll only keep trying?