Sally Challen

[Tilly2]

You may remember me posting this link wishing this woman well.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1648041.html

She has had the conviction for murder quashed and is now back home.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-47845450

She will now face a new trial and again, I hope that things turn out positively for her.

[Calicogirl]

It is relevant Baldric, it let's the rest of us know if you have the slightest idea what you're talking about.

[jno]

Did he have an opportunity to deny such behaviour

it's not customary for the dead to defend their behaviour, but the accused may still present evidence as to its nature, which may be contested.

[agchristie]

My hunch is that the Defence still have their work cut out.

I hope this is a case which the jury can at least decide 10-2.

[Mamyalynne]

Sometimes you have to blink and reread to convince yourself you haven't just imagined what was on the screen.

[Togo]

A murder conviction requires evidence of some forethought Tills. Like going out of you way to be at the scene of the crime, or arranging it. Or taking, or stashing a weapon at the crime scene, or continuing a course of action that may result in death even when a target is incapacitated. Unless you of course coerced into doing these things.

[Tilly2]

It's not irrelevant, Baldric. You just can't answer it.

[Tilly2]

Thanks, Togo. I understand that now.

I don't believe she did plan this. I believe she just snapped.

[Baldric]

// It is relevant Baldric, it let's the rest of us know if you have the slightest idea what you're talking about //

// It's not irrelevant, Baldric. You just can't answer it //

1, More idea than you I suspect.
2, I did answer it, honestly, what more do you want?

[Calicogirl]

You can suspect what you like Baldric, you're coming across as not having a clue and just being shouty and ridiculous. Yelling 'End of' all the time is not a debate, it's a poor man's attempt to deflect attention from the fact he hasn't got anything to debate.

[Tilly2]

Where did you answer it, Baldric? I can't find it. I'm sure you can though.

[Baldric]

19:47 Tilly, I'm sure you commented on it,

Calico, you have a strange idea of shouting, just because someone does not share your opinion.

[Calicogirl]

Alright, whether you shout it, say it, whisper it even, it's still not an argument, it's you saying 'I am right because that's what I think' without having any ability factual or otherwise to back your argument up when asked.

[Tilly2]

@ 19:43
It is not relevant so yes' ignored.

So, that's your answer? How convenient.

I asked if you could explain the difference between murder and killing and you say it's not relevant. Pff.

[spathiphyllum]

self defence? Yes

OTT? yes

[Calicogirl]

Would you like to share the brick wall I'm banging my head against Tilly? x

[Baldric]

// Yelling 'End of' all the time //
I used it once, if you are unable to count that is not my problem.

// without having any ability factual or otherwise to back your argument up when asked //

The retrospective law she seems to be relying on did not come into force until 5 years after she murdered her husband.

[spathiphyllum]

did she do it whilst during a confrontation?

[sherrardk]

She didn’t murder him, that conviction has been over turned.

[Barmaid]

She is NOT relying on a law retrospectively. That relates to an offence not a defence.

[Tilly2]

Hey, Calico. Another brick in the wall!