The Shadow Leader of The House said yesterday that if there could be agreement with the Tories about upcoming business, Labour would vote for a recess.
After the motion was defeated, Rees-Mogg gave details of upcoming Parliamentary plans this Monday to Thursday.
The Shadow Leader said that this could have been agreed through "the usual channels" and the recess could have gone ahead.
It appears there was either no discussion about the business plans or if there was, it broke down.
A bit petty?
Yes, but hardly surprising in the circumstances.
MPs will have to shuttle between London and Manchester. For other delegates (the vast majority) it will make no difference.
In any case the conference had already been sceneries down. I believe only a handful at best of cabinet ministers were down to speak.
Actually, upon reflection, the Conference may go a little better in the absence of the "Honourable Members." The HoC will be barely affected because, as noted, the government has no majority there anyway and they might as well lose a division by a couple of hundred votes as by 42 (or whatever).
Thought we had the Tory Party, yesterday, in Parliament how many Parties do these Tories want, they even had their own Party Clown , think his name was Boris
I really can't see how the Hof P can help resolve the Brexit issue at the moment even if it were to sit 24 hours a day for the next few weeks. After all the years and months of talking and the spate of indicative votes there is no consensus on anything other than 'ask for more time'. Until the EU and Boris's team can come up with a proposal or until the date for asking for an extension is reached I can't see what 'exceptional' things the HoC can sort out. By all means it's useful to discuss things like Domestic Violence but I don't see the 'exceptional times' argument at all. It's just spite and point scoring that led to the not unexpected decision not to allow a short recess