I feel the royal family should not be defending Andrew, and instead putting the spotlight on him, else it gives the impression the royals condone the behaviour.
If this was anyone else they would face retribution and trial.
As you have said spath, it was in the tittle of the documentary and you say it is on the internet, but has a newspaper ever put it like that?
If they have, they could face being sued.
spath I'm not saying I don't believe you just that I can't access the headline. Your link does say /americas/jeffrey-epstein-trump-relationship-pedophile-money-wife-clinton-prince-andrew-sex-trafficking- but it doesn't put it into perspective. You don't have to prove it, I'm quite happy to take your word for it.
You *do* realise that Epstein and PA are 2 different people, don't you, spath?
It is quite possible/likely that Epstein *was* a paedophile; it doesn't follow that PA is and as already stated, having sex with a 17-year old doesn't signify much.
Many of the older blokes on this forum wouldn't knock back the opportunity of getting jiggy with a willing 17 year old.
You'll be the same when there is a greater difference between 17 y.o. and the age you are now....
No, i'm not sure I would. 18+? maybe.. 21 +? certainly.
I remember what it was like to be 17.. Gosh what a young mind. I'm not that old myself right now, and i wouldn't contemplate sleeping with someone below the age of 18 i truly would feel grim.