Donate SIGN UP

What Shud Boris Do Now?

Avatar Image
agchristie | 08:57 Fri 20th Nov 2020 | News
113 Answers
If the ministerial code is broken how serious should the consequences be in this case?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55010929

The code says "harassing, bullying or other inappropriate or discriminating behaviour" will not be tolerated.

It adds that ministers are "personally responsible" for how they act - and that they can stay in office "for so long as they retain the confidence of the prime minister".

Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 113rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Andy, ag... //Its funny when folk say 'personally speaking'!//

You would think so... but on AB, you get all kinds. I have given a personal opinion for someone to reply "you don't speak for ME!". Well... clearly... but not everyone can read properly...
Question Author
Pixie ha!!!!! v gud!

Another one of those daft words is 'actually' ;-)
Once Boris Gets his Bonking hat on , Carrie will soon get rid of Priti Attractive.
It's all being revealed now , apparantly Boris tried to interfere with the enquiry to try to sway it to Priti Patels favour. Oh dear Boris , Big mistake.
11.35 He may have already had the cap on, hence, must do all to keep the Larry in the bag.
11.35 , Do you mean that Prity knows where the bodies are buried also.
Man kicks civil servant - we should all cheer

it is not as tho they were kicking a little puppy dog or drowning kittens
A shame that some of these snowflake civil servants didn't spend any time under the tender care of a drill sergeant. They'd know what it's all about then.
Jack, very true.I noticed in the report that at times Priti did not get support from the civil servants.
Jackdaw - // A shame that some of these snowflake civil servants didn't spend any time under the tender care of a drill sergeant. They'd know what it's all about then. //

It's easy to scoff when we are unaware of exactly what has gone on, but I know from a lifetime of experience in offices that bullying is very real, and it can affect anyone at any level, even the seemingly 'tough' personalities can be bullied by someone senior with an axe to grind.

I think it's wrong to jump to the conclusion that the recipient of bullying must automatically be simply too weak to stand up for themselves - it's rarely that simple.
AH, each to his own opinion. Shouting and swearing at me wouldn't bother me.Sticks and stones etc.
Question Author
How does someone make something unpalatable 'palatable'?
Take un away.
shouting and swearing at employees is a sign of incompetent leadership (no surprise here) and can lead to claims for constructive dismissal, though I don't suppose Boris would have any qualms about paying off victims - he's always been a great one for wasting other people's money.
//How does someone make something unpalatable 'palatable'?\\

You take the 'un' off the front.
Question Author
Danny,Ive worked in a few offices and shouting and swearing was never acceptable.

Snap Jack ^^
agc, maybe nobody in your office gave any cause to be shouted at.
danny - // AH, each to his own opinion. Shouting and swearing at me wouldn't bother me.Sticks and stones etc. //

It wouldn't bother me either, but that is a one-dimensional view of what bullying is.

I am no-one's shrinking violet I am sure you would agree, but in my time at work, I have experienced bullying sufficient to make a Grievence to get it stopped.

It was not 'shouting and swearing', it was daily insidious drip-drip-drip of undermining, confidence-draining self-esteem chipping sniping and criticsm by a manager with considerable power over my work environment and my career prospects.

It doesn't have to be overt confrontation in order to be bullying, and you don;t need to be a 'snowflake' to be affected.

Assuming simple stereotype situations is to miss the reality of what might have gone on - none of us know, but it is unlikely to have been limited to the odd hissy fit and a bit of inapproprioate language.
The civil serpants at the Home Office are made up mainly of Remainiacs and were, still are, in thrall to Brussels. They were anti Patel before she even got the job and apoplectic when she did. It has just been another manifestation of the malice maintained by the hate filled losers of the Referendum. Bet one thing though. Had Patel been a member of a different sort of Asian group they would not have dared to malign and plot against her. That would be a hate crime I warrant. When she insisted that they did their jobs without reporting back to the EUSSR at every opportunity they spat the dummies out. She should have sacked the lot. Don't even know why we needed them when all policy was decided behind closed doors in Brussels anyway. We should be starting with a nice, clean, shiny, uncorrupted set of office tools.

81 to 100 of 113rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

What Shud Boris Do Now?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.