Anyone For "Sarah's Law"?

[OrcadianOil]

Yet another kiddie fiddler has managed to ply his evil trade and has been able to groom at least one more innocent child right under its mother's nose. He has been "severely punished" with a wet lettuce leaf and given 4 months inside. (He may well have been released by the time I've finished typing!)

It proves, does it not, that the present system is deeply flawed? Maybe the introduction of "Sarah's Law", where paedos are "named, shamed" and the address of the sewer they're presently living in is made known to the wider community, would nip such atrocities in the bud?

Or do the "bleeding hearts" win the day again by arguing that the "human rights" of the pervert are far more precious than the safety of innocent children? Woops, no, we daren't risk having vigilante patrols on the streets. No, let our kids suffer instead, eh?

http://www.newsofthew...-reveal-his-name.html

[LoftyLottie]

Oh I forget, Joe is the only 'Real Man' on AB!!

I am really pleased I don't know any 'Real Men' whatsoever!!

[joeluke]

Daffy.........got it in one

[Greedyfly]

You disgust me!

[Zeuhl]

Naomi

///paedophiles necessarily operate underground, don't they? ///

I meant off the police radar. In this case the guy seems to have been monitored by police and was thus apprehended.

My point is that 'sarah's law' would cause all sorts of trouble and above all could give parents a false sense of security that they 'know who the paedos are' when anyone sneaking into their neighbourhood or online could be a threat.

The only real defence is vigilance by parents concerning their own children's activities and contacts.

.

[joeluke]

They disgust me

[ChuckFickens]

Would you kindly stop trying to be a spokesperson for all "males"

You most certainly do not reflect my opinions and I would rather you did not insult the average males intelligence by claiming you represent their views.

[Greedyfly]

Agreed Chuck

I have never met a man with such a view and hope I never will

[joeluke]

Another one in denial.........wouldn't wanna upset his 'friends' on here by agreeing
now would he?

[Greedyfly]

I think Chuck made a very valid point.

It is people like you who disgust me. There is no need for closed mindedness. You are entitled to your view as we all are but I find it ridiculous and offensive!

[ummmm]

Do you really find it that hard to accept that not all men are like you Joe?

[LoftyLottie]

So Joe Luke would disown his own child if he/she was gay. Joe Luke you are disgusting. I still like to think you are a wind up merchant for your own sake.

[Zeuhl]

///Another one in denial///

Accusing people who disagree with him of secretly agreeing???

A poor argument. It seems you're the one in denial JL.

There are blokes who don't share your views - get used to it.

.

[joeluke]

ummm, I do accept that not all men are like me

Almost used the 'N' word there but thought better not

[Zeuhl]

Jl and the 'N word'?

Err 'Numpty' perhaps?
.

[joeluke]

LL, my son is 8, and yes if he became that way inclined then he would no longer be my son

No fear of that though cos he will be shown the correct path

[Greedyfly]

You astound me.

[LoftyLottie]

Personally, if Joe Luke isn't winding us up, then I think he has issues with his own sexuality. He is too obsessed with homosexuality and shouts too loud. A bit suspicious in my opinion.

[Greedyfly]

Anyone who could disown there children for just being who they are is a disgusting excuse for a human being in my opinion.

I cannot believe people like this still exist.

[ummmm]

It's so shocking it's making me laugh...

[LoftyLottie]

LOL Zeuhl. Yes, Numpty, says it all.