Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Well I'm Gutted
After 50 years of having a clean license, I'm pretty sure yesterday I've been done, coming out of a 40mph to a 30mph I was still doing about 34/35 when I saw the police camera van on side of road. Had not been in the car long after a walk and was a bit hot and bothered. DAM! :( Now got to wait and see. This will hurt if so!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by teacake44. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm more interested in 2 completely opposite responses-One from Retrocop and the other from Rockrose. Whilst both are suggesting the 'Awareness course' the fact is that the police themselves have a responsibility to make their presence visible , which they are failing to do if there is to be an option of attending a 'speed awareness course' as an alternative . Double standards I think? Nobody speeds deliberately unless contemplating suicide.
ness
ness
Grandpappy//Nobody speeds deliberately unless contemplating suicide. //
I didn’t know my husband was suicidal. I must try to talk to him about it.
He speeds because he’s impatient and he thinks the rules don’t apply to him. I would guess that’s true for the worst speeders.
Calling someone in for doing 31 in a 30 limit is ridiculous.
I didn’t know my husband was suicidal. I must try to talk to him about it.
He speeds because he’s impatient and he thinks the rules don’t apply to him. I would guess that’s true for the worst speeders.
Calling someone in for doing 31 in a 30 limit is ridiculous.
I might just add that the small stretch of 30mph between the two 40mph is a very affluent area, house prices min £600.000 /700.000. Its funny as lasts nights news, police chiefs complaining of struggling to fight serious crime, due to a shortage of twenty thousand officers, how can they be that short, having two officers sitting in a camera van, on a small stretch of 30mph. why not have a permanent camera there, ( if its a trouble spot?) why did they do away with so many permanent cameras?
Grandpappy
It was for good reason that police officers were once allowed to use their common sense and discretion in deciding who to prosecute or caution.When I was a former Traffic officer I never volunteered to join a radar team hiding in a front garden. Any speeding offenders I stopped were pursuit speeds over 5/10 of a mile. It was only me on the ground who made the decision to prosecute or caution depending on the circumstances at the time and not by a random film interpreter who picks the highest 10% out of thousands of camera photos.
It was for good reason that police officers were once allowed to use their common sense and discretion in deciding who to prosecute or caution.When I was a former Traffic officer I never volunteered to join a radar team hiding in a front garden. Any speeding offenders I stopped were pursuit speeds over 5/10 of a mile. It was only me on the ground who made the decision to prosecute or caution depending on the circumstances at the time and not by a random film interpreter who picks the highest 10% out of thousands of camera photos.
//Can you get done for doing 31 in a 30?. Thought it had to be 10% over?//
The National Police Chiefs’ Council has guidance which suggests that enforcement should not be taken at speeds below (Limit + 10% +2mph). I have heard reports of people having action taken below that speeds but have never seen any evidence myself.
//…the fact is that the police themselves have a responsibility to make their presence visible , which they are failing to do if there is to be an option of attending a 'speed awareness course' as an alternative .//
Whatever gives you that idea? They have no more responsibility to “make their presence visible” when detecting speeding motorists than they have when hiding in the bushes to catch a burglar coming out of a property he has just burgled. That they might offer a speed awareness course as an alternative to court action (something they will not know until the vehicle’s speed has been established) is neither here nor there.
The National Police Chiefs’ Council has guidance which suggests that enforcement should not be taken at speeds below (Limit + 10% +2mph). I have heard reports of people having action taken below that speeds but have never seen any evidence myself.
//…the fact is that the police themselves have a responsibility to make their presence visible , which they are failing to do if there is to be an option of attending a 'speed awareness course' as an alternative .//
Whatever gives you that idea? They have no more responsibility to “make their presence visible” when detecting speeding motorists than they have when hiding in the bushes to catch a burglar coming out of a property he has just burgled. That they might offer a speed awareness course as an alternative to court action (something they will not know until the vehicle’s speed has been established) is neither here nor there.