<<Stafford-Clark;
“The passion with which they will defend this . . . is yet further vivid evidence of the emotional necessity of belief" .............
Cobblers!>>
Indeed Naomi.
The Stafford Clark quote (who is he? and who says he's an authority anyway) does not bear any intelligent scrutiny - like much of what goodlife copies and pastes onto here.
If someone argues for something (eg atheism or democracy or the superiority of scrambled eggs over fried) with “passion" there is no direct correlation with an "emotional necessity of belief".
Atheism is a viewpoint based on rational thought and consideration of available evidence. By definition, it is the opposite of 'belief' which does not rely on rational thought or evidence.
Some people believe in The Tooth Fairy. I can't be positive, but based on the evidence available to me I very much doubt it exists and could argue that passionately. To try and suggest that this viewpoint shows a 'necessity to believe' The Tooth Fairy doesn't exist is plainly ridiculous. And pointless.
If people want to believe in stuff that the rest of us are happy to do without - fine. But don't try and gain comfort by trying to include the rest of us in some variant of your fantasy.