Cheltenham 2.55 - 2 Fatalities
Sport1 min ago
For anyone who wants to digress from the OP and talk about the pros and cons of boxing as a sport and whether or not it should be banned.
https:/
Utilising their own natural abilities is not cheating as per the rules laid out by the body running the Olympics.
It's coming to the point where I'm starting to think that the best thing that can happen, for the sake of all involved, is for the boxers to voluntarily withdraw and subject themselves to further testing by a more reliable source. Of course, that isn't going to happen.
Why don't you stop basketball players over 6 feet as they have a genetic advantage over smaller players?
Why dont you stop West African countries competing in long distance races as they have a genetic advantage?
Why don't you stop Caribbean countries from sprinting as they have a genetic advantage?
Why don't you stop Mike Tyson from boxing as he has a genetic advantage over lesser men?
These are women that have a genetic advantage, they are not transgender or have taken treatments, everything is natural and as such they have every right to compete. If the other women are not as strong then don't take up boxing!
Mozz - Of course, that isn't going to happen and the IOC aren't going to tell them to withdraw, so we will see at least one medal won by a man having punched his way passed women boxers.
Bringing back the cheek-swab test is, surely, the simplest and least invasive way to ensure that no-one with a y-chromosome features in women's sports?
//Why don't you stop basketball players over 6 feet as they have a genetic advantage over smaller players?//
Men play against men and women play against women.
//Why dont you stop West African countries competing in long distance races as they have a genetic advantage?//
Men race against men and women race against women.
//Why don't you stop Caribbean countries from sprinting as they have a genetic advantage?//
Men race against men and women race against women.
Why don't you stop Mike Tyson from boxing as he has a genetic advantage over lesser men?
Mike Tyson and his opponents were men.
//These are women that have a genetic advantage, they are not transgender or have taken treatments, everything is natural and as such they have every right to compete.//
They should be boxing other men in a similar weight class
//If the other women are not as strong then don't take up boxing!//
A woman should not have to try to be as strong as a man in order to compete in her chosen sport.
Well, i've read just about as much as i can find on the Algerian boxer and it seems to me that she was banned by the Russian-led IBA, 3 days after beating a hitherto unbeaten Russian boxer. The IBA said she had failed tests - tests which she had presumably passed in order to fight in previous World Championships - but have never stipulated why she failed the test.
JTH says that various feredrations have banned both boxers from competing in women's bouts, but i can only find eveidence that it is just the quite corrupt IBA, an organisation that has no longer any influence in the Olympics.
Weird that many on here treat everything Russian with disbeief and scepticism, yet are willing to take at face value the banning of these two boxers by a Russian-led organisation?
If any of you can provide clear proof that either or both of these women posses the Y chromosome, i'd be very thankful.
There is no oversight of the boxing apart from that of IOC.
IOC have decided that an F (female) in a passport - from a country which allows you to choose which box to tick - is sufficient to allow these men to claim they are women.
I have no idea as to the make up of their genitalia but the fact that eaxh has a y-chromosome is sufficient for most people to view them as men.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.